From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N5f64-00021u-No for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:36:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36DE9E0B2B; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:36:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ew0-f206.google.com (mail-ew0-f206.google.com [209.85.219.206]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30E3E0B2B for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so4862215ewy.34 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:36:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=2eZpr7C527igTj1Zml/4Bc75WRDFONAsoLs4a1rb6oI=; b=uJB78l24RRXERjeAn+QiUlpAwwE4v9O3/QHuczhTzhRByf7AsMcHJaA3E2JeihhW+k GLclkmpDgXzjeSTYJN7re8GWGcWP0X/Pbb4+IDBtVB0/CopYDdps1LBPgeVHYSzv64Lg yPbm2DDFvTVGpHBi+HIYwHAXthKuItf3YVzVQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=jwJC+YAZMcUbooQCuANAfhjQbq8dTI5j7XMaP58AQJBJZoKcoAv1SYeakyZSA7atOR JkPhvbLOf21AIbT7CCdTb+lvMWn1u3Rv85j1U6Mdyv8PjVEuG2F4KqooskhYAniq6elz YLw9e+04R0oBZXwqPhTuBkSU+ZodULjsLxRs8= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: yngwin.gentoo@gmail.com Received: by 10.239.139.143 with SMTP id t15mr173107hbt.92.1257338178315; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:36:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20091103191005.18d98e2e@gentoo.org> References: <200911011736.38401.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <20091102151707.0b155aab@gentoo.org> <200911021724.01069.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <20091103191005.18d98e2e@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:36:18 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 15858b882785af45 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations From: Ben de Groot To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: ebd6905e-d259-4a74-afc1-c6b05300f330 X-Archives-Hash: e401ed9cfbb6b74c87ec94bfdd9b5c7a What about ppc64? They are MONTHS behind on stabilization, even for security bugs (see bug 281821 for example). The Qt team feels this is no longer acceptable. We propose that any arch that can't keep up will be demoted to experimental status. -- Ben de Groot Gentoo Linux developer (qt, media, lxde, desktop-misc) ______________________________________________________