From: R Hill <dirtyepic.sk@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain.eclass and gcc 4.1 snapshots
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:20:50 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e051b1$535$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <442541D3.3070500@telia.com>
Simon Strandman wrote:
> It seems like toolchain.eclass does something wrong when configuring gcc
> 4.1 snapshots. I decided to try gcc 4.1 on my server so I created a
> gcc-4.1.1.20060324 ebuild and defined the SNAPSHOT variable in it
> (current cvs has a lot of bugfixes since the release). This is the way
> I've done it with gcc 4.0 and I never had any problems then. The ebuild
> emerges without problems but it installs files in both
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1-20060324 and
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1. So when I try to emerge anything
> it always fails with errors like this:
>
> configure:2239: i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -march=pentium3 -pipe
> -fomit-frame-pointer -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 conftest.c >&5
> /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.1.1/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
> cannot find -lgcc_s
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> Just copying over the files from one dir to the other and then
> symlinking it works around the problems. Any ideas?
This is caused by changes to the build system in 4.1 and GCC's BASE-VER not
matching portage's ${PV} in snapshot builds. Most of the system directories are
set up by portage during configure using ${PV} as part of the dirname. (eg.
includedir=/usr/<lib>/gcc/<chost>/${PV}/include). However, libdir and
libexecdir aren't set by portage (because they generate really strange paths w/
--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs in GCC 3.3/3.4) and default to
/usr/<lib>/gcc/<chost>/BASE-VER/blah. When ${PV} != BASE-VER, wackiness ensues.
Try this in your ebuild:
src_unpack() {
toolchain_src_unpack
echo ${PV/_/-} > "${S}"/gcc/BASE-VER
echo "" > "${S}"/gcc/DATESTAMP
}
--de.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-26 3:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-25 13:12 [gentoo-dev] toolchain.eclass and gcc 4.1 snapshots Simon Strandman
2006-03-26 3:20 ` R Hill [this message]
2006-03-27 8:54 ` [gentoo-dev] " Simon Strandman
2006-03-27 10:09 ` Simon Strandman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='e051b1$535$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=dirtyepic.sk@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox