From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
id 1F06o6-0000AF-NF
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:40:43 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k0L0dswC011504;
Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:39:54 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k0L0c9xO023502
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:38:09 GMT
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org)
by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
id 1F06lc-00085s-Kz
for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:38:08 +0000
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1F06lQ-0001nM-QO
for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:37:58 +0100
Received: from 24.72.131.65 ([24.72.131.65])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:37:56 +0100
Received: from dirtyepic.sk by 24.72.131.65 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sat, 21 Jan 2006 01:37:56 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: R Hill <dirtyepic.sk@gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 21:03:08 -0600
Message-ID: <dqrvou$gpt$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <200601150111.54995.vapier@gentoo.org> <7573e9640601170711t202a4466y910605a46cab1fb2@mail.gmail.com> <1137516711.28568.3.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal> <200601171803.48108@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <1137520889.28568.9.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.72.131.65
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.6a1 (X11/20060113)
In-Reply-To: <1137520889.28568.9.camel@cocagne.max-t.internal>
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id k0L0dsxm011504
X-Archives-Salt: 4adce084-0176-4bdb-a8c1-63a45c77e431
X-Archives-Hash: 6f4eb66e98caa5bfe5e091ae4c36d940
Olivier Crete wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-17-01 at 18:03 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten=F2 wrote:
>> On Tuesday 17 January 2006 17:51, Olivier Crete wrote:
>>> The argument in favor of splitdebug is that it allows users to give
>>> useful bugreports when using tools such as gnome's bug-buddy.
>> Erm actually it does not. Unless gnome herd fixed it recently.
>> The same goes for KCrashHandler/Dr Konqui.
Ditto on Dr. Konqi here.
> It does on my system, bug-buddy just spawned GDB (and it has worked tha=
t
> way for as long as I can remember). So you just need gdb 5/6 and it
> should work without problems with splitdebug.
Could be i need to up the level of debug info i'm gathering. What CFLAGS=
do you
happen to use?
--de.
--=20
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list