From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EgsId-0006Y7-77 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:20:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jASNJYU0032006; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:19:34 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jASNGDSi003480 for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:16:13 GMT Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EgsEH-0001PF-3H for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:16:13 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EgsC6-0007cM-NP for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:13:58 +0100 Received: from 206-163-248-179.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca ([206.163.248.179]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:13:58 +0100 Received: from dirtyepic.sk by 206-163-248-179.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:13:58 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: R Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Moving GCC-3.4 to stable on x86 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:11:18 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20051128142233.GA19195@aerie.halcy0n.com> <438B4877.2040808@gentoo.org> <1133216692.22506.39.camel@athena.fprintf.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 206-163-248-179.yktn.hsdb.sasknet.sk.ca User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.6a1 (X11/20051124) In-Reply-To: <1133216692.22506.39.camel@athena.fprintf.net> Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: aee584c7-de4b-4c76-afbe-677ee40a3357 X-Archives-Hash: 16d65aa773c5ae56fdc6e6b271dd4cbb Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 19:12 +0100, Bjarke Istrup Pedersen wrote: > >> Does this mean that we can get rid of the libstd++ dependency of gcc, >> and move it to the binary packages that depends on gcc 3.3 . >> I know this has been discussed before, but once it's stable I see no >> reason to keep the dependency in the gcc ebuild, when it could be in the >> binary packages. >> > > Well, right after the upgrade, there will still be tons of non-binary > programs built against the old libstdc++, so no. Unless you want to > force everyone to emerge -e world after the upgrade (which will make you > very unpopular). Everybody _should_ be doing emerge -e world after the upgrade. :P But moving the libstdc++-v3 dep from gcc to packagefoo-bin would cause breakage for anyone who tries to run binary packages built against gcc 3.3 and not installed through portage. Firefox nightlies come to mind. --de. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list