From: R Hill <dirtyepic.sk@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split ELF Debug (defult or not?)
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 13:20:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dmach6$lh8$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1133027430.5317.307.camel@localhost>
Ned Ludd wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> probably in portage-2.0.54 a patch will be added to emit split debug
> info. Having a split debug allows us to retain all the advantages of
> stripping executables while gaining the ability to properly debug
> executables in bfd aware programs. It's been in testing with a small
> hand full of devs and works quite well, but before it's pushed in we
> would like to get input from our devs & users.
>
> Would you be willing to give up space in $ROOT/usr/lib/debug for ELF
> executables by default in order to aid in better debugging by or do we
> want to only emit it when a FEATURE= is defined.
How much space are we talking about?
I like on-by-default, along with a feature option to turn it off.
--de.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-26 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-26 17:50 [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?) Ned Ludd
2005-11-26 18:30 ` Bruno
2005-11-26 18:55 ` [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (default " Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 9:53 ` Kevin F. Quinn
2005-11-27 12:18 ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-26 19:15 ` [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult " Olivier Crête
2005-11-26 19:20 ` R Hill [this message]
2005-11-27 12:24 ` [gentoo-dev] Re: Split ELF Debug (default " Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 13:09 ` Ivan Yosifov
2005-11-27 13:32 ` Edward Catmur
2005-11-27 13:40 ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 15:22 ` Edward Catmur
2005-11-27 15:44 ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 16:55 ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 21:01 ` Ivan Yosifov
2005-11-27 22:24 ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-28 11:00 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-11-27 18:03 ` Mark Loeser
2005-11-27 19:51 ` Olivier Crête
2005-11-26 19:22 ` [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult " Ivan Yosifov
2005-11-26 20:01 ` Mike Frysinger
2005-11-26 21:42 ` Petteri Räty
2005-11-27 0:48 ` Dan Meltzer
2005-11-27 0:53 ` Mart Raudsepp
2005-11-27 12:23 ` [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (default " Ned Ludd
2005-11-26 23:10 ` [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult " Luca Barbato
2005-11-27 12:54 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-11-27 14:39 ` Dan Meltzer
2005-11-27 14:49 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-11-27 14:50 ` Ned Ludd
2005-11-27 15:31 ` Edward Catmur
2005-11-28 1:18 ` Georgi Georgiev
2005-11-28 4:21 ` Edward Catmur
2005-11-27 15:04 ` Tavis Ormandy
2005-11-27 15:30 ` Dan Meltzer
2005-11-28 11:14 ` Paul de Vrieze
2005-11-27 22:35 ` Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)
2005-11-28 10:51 ` Paul de Vrieze
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='dmach6$lh8$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=dirtyepic.sk@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox