From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47731139694 for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 19:35:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65D7A21C07B; Mon, 15 May 2017 19:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1769E21C06D for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 19:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elminster.home.yuryweb.com (pool-74-108-218-175.nycmny.fios.verizon.net [74.108.218.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: blueknight) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F71C33BE1A; Mon, 15 May 2017 19:33:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1494185038.1333.2.camel@gentoo.org> <1494270782.1333.6.camel@gentoo.org> From: Yury German Organization: Gentoo Linux Message-ID: Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 15:33:50 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CfkIOIkofDJcGf5IuT4AvE45HbpBODMbn" X-Archives-Salt: 676de3cb-9b4a-4dce-86f9-fe394a9d0276 X-Archives-Hash: 21e20b411e2c01b7549acc5d39887fb0 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --CfkIOIkofDJcGf5IuT4AvE45HbpBODMbn Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="nHaTstKLcfbOMDTC6MdfcstmPRSxeWIw4"; protected-headers="v1" From: Yury German To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp References: <1494185038.1333.2.camel@gentoo.org> <1494270782.1333.6.camel@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: --nHaTstKLcfbOMDTC6MdfcstmPRSxeWIw4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would prefer PPC and for that matter arm (which are no longer security supported) going the Non-stable route. This would prevent the need for stabilization and everything but @system we can instruct the users to use ~ppc. This would also allow for security to not drop it from security supported arches and just follow a more relaxed policy for non-stable packages. For those not familiar, we (security) only need to have the package in tree and the vulnerable packages dropped, which is easily accomplished by the maintainer with no need for arches to get involved. Yury German (BlueKnight) On 5/14/17 8:03 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 5/14/17 6:38 AM, Michael Weber wrote: >> On 05/08/2017 09:13 PM, David Seifert wrote: >>> If all of this ends in one big bikeshedding fest again, I will start >>> dekeywording packages. Fortunately for me, I won't get any complaints= >>> (because the arch teams are dead). >> formal complaint, powerpc team is alive, and I'm lead. >> >=20 > I defer to the ppc lead's decision on this. While I am okay with > dekeywording everything *but* @system for ppc, I prefer keeping ppc > keywords. >=20 --nHaTstKLcfbOMDTC6MdfcstmPRSxeWIw4-- --CfkIOIkofDJcGf5IuT4AvE45HbpBODMbn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZGgKfAAoJEB9lYVdQaQ1QdCIH/RZJeld24bl4lL0vGevBJjuY GJuLO/Onv5H+ScDkycKXclDjyKgdgNbfm71vBYT05Xg+VcrmSkjlLCoCHkJCdNAt Z22sLYjljNlABdoW8QnT8Aw4GIL3W2MNSdx+5VuiTnvpX7QaWxFUiw4KK8nwp50p TYE0+Jgw/j7G76pok9+WASS7E78816FLg+gKszsO7BFDiVB3dHzPGnrN5wd1DO6n ajn+f5sxcP5TRCHZnPQLRqEEQAsbGY1UPCkTlD7lcPzW6WoONbldjp/E0e8tA74b 6lZfpMAM4wye9cz9lbk887QeLXhCnzNfRKUs5rS9PIzcVuUB7d/ujbvakvuqU6s= =4gRq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CfkIOIkofDJcGf5IuT4AvE45HbpBODMbn--