From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6Kgc-0002qa-0R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:24:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96060E02D0; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:24:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.247]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C87E02D0 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 07:24:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so2915205rvf.46 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:23:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=m1CCzXZE5aNjw2MOjs6RJkZStuizFl/Dt7WHjB3II5M=; b=TNfA0yDg9lPRqGvs4j+JM1cqhZvE1oUmBjXdamEcP9bL+nloVzbQdoC9bxCw4mycEu IHb2biCwrU0VY0TeeXZtKpVZtXxbekEkr/rvjKvx43maDaXTDATKYOsMUI1KQTaSF0tB w7shVdvZJZl7YJRZ06LHaM/brxqx+3o+iCtIQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=F0qdt1uNfSQvVgOlTfWvHZUj38YQV+YFtNba35uKpGctelkJUXFet3s9FT3UFUyZQA cz3c3ndZ9VECY/b0GLKr2uLqxXpX+IbpdFFAXJCoIROrmARSVPMIEc23W2MXPY8AHQF4 s2BdTFiwZgEEU62nHUpMi+JDAaCmYNo0HBD6k= Received: by 10.141.15.19 with SMTP id s19mr3634250rvi.124.1213169039924; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.141.211.15 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:23:59 +0100 From: "Richard Brown" Sender: mynamewasgone@gmail.com To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2 - Let's get it started In-Reply-To: <484F7C2F.8050807@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <484EAB4F.6070608@gentoo.org> <20080611010347.6ced7db2@sheridan.genone.homeip.net> <200806110142.38384.zlin@gentoo.org> <20080611074944.00965ad2@toz.strangled.net> <20080611065442.38e67d90@googlemail.com> <484F6A3A.9000500@gentoo.org> <20080611070540.0fc417c3@googlemail.com> <484F76D4.7080703@gentoo.org> <20080611075952.2d9bf494@googlemail.com> <484F7C2F.8050807@gentoo.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: b531071345bce73d X-Archives-Salt: 3492a07b-2956-4c9d-a01e-f5f8fe26d30b X-Archives-Hash: eb028b3b1f43c6794c99529b84876611 On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 08:18, Luca Barbato wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> >> Ok, if EAPI 2 turns on src_test except where explicitly overridden by >> the ebuild, explain how EAPI 2 src_test failures are meaningless in the >> same way that EAPI 0/1 src_test failures are. > > Test failures aren't meaningless right now. Applications with good test > suites got them used by the people that cares already. If you care about tests now, how do you know if foo.ebuild failed its src_test because there's a problem or if src_test failed because no one else has ever run it with test in FEATURES? Also, I think you seem to be suggesting that gentoo is so well tested that once something's marked stable, there's no point in testing it. -- Richard Brown -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list