From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Egum3-0002gC-PJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:59:16 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAT1wXfS022795; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:58:33 GMT Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.202]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAT1ugKN030719 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 01:56:43 GMT Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z3so2278882nzf for ; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:56:42 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=dCeqaytPGRLckt/Pn1f+5j4yelMhGvv2rUry+RxcD0gLuruD0es+Lcnbq6QaVl9WKMeB7Wc41eeBNdJtpssLsucSN8HVOg8/Mxy/R4tZnotgu0zyNHDrL42/n1qShMiVBiARyt3BBupKAXZ7mhxF9ceQpM8Kw3xvlNc4Uk8TFgs= Received: by 10.36.222.48 with SMTP id u48mr4069230nzg; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:56:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.20.13 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:56:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 17:56:42 -0800 From: Bret Towe To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc & binutils -aware hackers wanted for questions ;) In-Reply-To: <1133227796.4229.2.camel@Darkmere.darkmere> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline References: <1133227796.4229.2.camel@Darkmere.darkmere> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id jAT1ugKN030719 X-Archives-Salt: 6f19d9ee-333f-4e04-821a-68da89c53d7c X-Archives-Hash: ffe4308a655b721b342153d4a75802d0 On 11/28/05, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote: > Hello, > I've been looking some at Michael Meeks -Bdirect patches, and the > possible performance boost they could give. > > The good parts here is that it seems to be far less intrusive for the > running system than prelink is, on the other hand, it does require a > more intrusive surgery into the core systems. > > So, now I'm just asking for comments and/or discussion here.. would it > be worth the time spent on this? > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00436.html looks interesting personally id like to see how it acts on kde also and some small c++ apps to see if it hurts them any a single benchmark for a change that would affect so much seems a bit silly to me -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list