From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-17556-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1GWk1e-0003oP-BU
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2006 01:33:50 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k991Wtqm004710;
Mon, 9 Oct 2006 01:32:55 GMT
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k991UvR5015054
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 9 Oct 2006 01:30:58 GMT
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x30so1811230nfb
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 08 Oct 2006 18:30:57 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=r6gL4Xv0a1PkV8y2MKaVUybdj0GlnPXaKslpmcR/yVRD7rU3AyUspXAhIsBWi9NFiekmZxg0syRWoRKhScuRTftuZ1MZYcN0kyI4K625Zd298UiVwzIuX61rVsJVm3yZWdt4xfpivY1bhaCvv9dwptAZE4R3jZ03kRb+MmczNkI=
Received: by 10.48.163.19 with SMTP id l19mr9219344nfe;
Sun, 08 Oct 2006 18:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.48.213.17 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 18:30:56 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d9b9989b0610081830y67d1f18eua69de58ecc12675e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2006 18:30:56 -0700
From: "Dice R. Random" <dicerandom@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] CFLAGS paragraph submission for the GWN
In-Reply-To: <45299ADD.1010903@bouton.name>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <45299ADD.1010903@bouton.name>
X-Archives-Salt: b4472f36-bdd6-450b-b5cf-3521b51537b5
X-Archives-Hash: e818f91967f52399e9f0135c0df50a37
On 10/8/06, Lionel Bouton <lionel-dev@bouton.name> wrote:
> Here's a draft of a paragraph discussing CFLAGS-related problems. This
> is the result of a discussion I started on gentoo-dev. Thanks to all
> devs who gave feedback this should bring some food for thought to GWN
> readers.
Hi Lionel,
Thanks for writing this up, great job. Nitpicking spelling and
grammar points to follow ;)
> configurability that are hallmarks of the <uri
> link=http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/about.xml> Gentoo experience</uri>.
Extra space before "Gentoo" here.
> for most users. There's usually very little benefit, high risks and much
> time spent on frustating tuning that could be enjoyed doing far more
> interesting things.
> </warn>
"frustating" should be "frustrating"
> <p>Example of this are :</p>
Should be plural: "Examples"
> <li><c>-fforce-addr</c> and <c>-fweb</c> break regularly on x86 with
> video libraries or graphic processing apps which use hand-optimised ASM.
> <c>-fweb</c> may be safe on amd64 but like above no guarantees</li>
"optimised" should be "optimized"
> For example <c>-ffast-math</c> is added by the xmame/xmess ebuilds on
> most architectures even tho you SHOULD NOT put it in your CFLAGS.</li>
"tho" should be "though"
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list