From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23A091580FD for ; Sun, 22 Dec 2024 15:39:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBBEFE08A5; Sun, 22 Dec 2024 15:38:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtprelay08.ispgateway.de (smtprelay08.ispgateway.de [134.119.228.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD273E038D for ; Sun, 22 Dec 2024 15:38:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [77.191.181.123] (helo=[192.168.178.31]) by smtprelay08.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1tPO2e-000000000uf-1q6l; Sun, 22 Dec 2024 16:38:52 +0100 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 16:38:52 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Maintainer needed for >=app-admin/checksec-3.0.0:3 after upstream re-write in Golang To: Sam James Cc: gentoo-dev References: <87o7141r55.fsf@gentoo.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Sebastian Pipping In-Reply-To: <87o7141r55.fsf@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Df-Sender: c3BpbmctZ2VudG9vQGJpbmVyYS5kZQ== X-Archives-Salt: 3f7390c4-9933-43ca-ad1f-6b5fcdd3dffe X-Archives-Hash: a23f83acb24b0c97b6db0d4ad96471fd On 22.12.24 01:46, Sam James wrote: > How do you propose the slot be handled? Do you plan to rename the 2.x > version as checksec-2 and have the :3 one be checksec or checksec-3? I originally envisioned two slots: 0 and 3 (or 0->2 and 3 if someone feels like a slot move). If it's considered beneficial to be two separate packages blocking each other or using fully disjoint filenames: no objections from my side. All I know is that the Bash version should live on for a while more and that I'm not the right person for the Golang ebuild, the rest is quite flexible. Thanks for your interest!