From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-35979-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1M5m7R-0004HL-JK
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 17 May 2009 19:33:58 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68444E0384;
Sun, 17 May 2009 19:33:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ew0-f165.google.com (mail-ew0-f165.google.com [209.85.219.165])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAD4E0384
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 17 May 2009 19:33:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so3523402ewy.34
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 17 May 2009 12:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to
:references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=UjYnzrRbIEaBIkyceC49CpO8YavgOmNckoCX9Rx/QZI=;
b=mczAvmdEtKygZjnIL14QG8iF78bbaxVaCPtzcc9lHR+I4Z1L5fL/FsAUb6mNxTLqGE
QFbTBNu+jFe01ZOg1YBFImfYJCSEAo7K1U6DyiZU19A8DkVE2bksoDLVnXLgP8Qb5Xyq
Fj2LtC3GxYvCQBUtJD5wO2rfPwgchWm6SAORY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date
:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
b=BMEXFbUprHqNie+mt1z+YR1rxVqiPBglL26CVUn8+OKvchxtwm7YZTfkef2F4HXuni
R0NMH4ul7fZAhgSNpRghRthhuQKNyNuFz0poEMxh0oBUxUXTfjEXOz1l5oqxFd/8ROxr
dcH3A7WbYaUGTEQsR6IEnOVe4uzm+liU64M64=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: p.jaroszynski@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.48.209 with SMTP id v59mr1850489web.78.1242588834092; Sun,
17 May 2009 12:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200905172057.27149.rbu@gentoo.org>
References: <d77765540905170856wa882914ica3dc4698c03bc96@mail.gmail.com>
<200905172057.27149.rbu@gentoo.org>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Piotr_Jaroszy=C5=84ski?= <peper@gentoo.org>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 21:33:34 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: d8a0e15ce6d4a680
Message-ID: <d77765540905171233q6d14e80fq1b079e8371493f27@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 55 updated
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: c3cceddf-5a48-464f-8936-b279eb3270c3
X-Archives-Hash: 99e5f0c0d3513b41d417e0c169c5fd7a
2009/5/17 Robert Buchholz <rbu@gentoo.org>:
> On Sunday 17 May 2009, Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have just updated GLEP 55 [1], hopefully making it a bit clearer.
>>
>> Just FYI, my order of preference of solutions is:
>>
>> 1. EAPI-suffixed ebuilds (obviously)
>> 2. EAPI in the filename with one-time extension change
>> 3. Easily fetchable EAPI inside the ebuild and one-time extension
>> change
>
> Judging from this list, fourth option present in the GLEP is
> unacceptable for you?
I would like to avoid user-visible breakage as much as possible.
--=20
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszy=C5=84ski