On 15/07/2024 04.39, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> On 7/10/24 11:38 PM, Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova wrote:
>> On 2024-07-10 09:19, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>>> From: Florian Schmaus <flow@gentoo.org>
>>>
>>> Add a new eclass for dev-util/rebar:3, based on the work of Anna
>>> Vyalkova in ::guru (thanks!).
>>
>> There's also rebar3.eclass in lanodanOverlay, hereby CC-ing Haelwenn on
>> this.
>>
>>> The Erlang/OTP ecosystem is moving to Rebar3. Upstreams start to drop
>>> support for Rebar2, or at least consider it.
>
> I can't find the first part of this email thread, including the actual
> submission of the eclass for review to the mailing list. Was this a
> private conversation?

No it wasn't a private conversation. But unfortunately I've used the 
wrong 'from' address, my personal one instead of the @gentoo.org 
address, so the mails did not went through. However, I didn't notice it, 
since the mails appeared in my inbox (due to me being CC'ed).

I'll resend the patchset again, probably the first thing I'll do 
tomorrow. Sorry for the inconvenience.


> I notice that it *has* been committed by Flow to ::gentoo already, and
> your request for Haelwenn's feedback hasn't yet been answered.

I looked at the rebar3.eclass from the lanodanOverlay before pushing the 
new eclass, there seem to be no relevant differences from the one in 
::guru/::gentoo. Judging from the commit history of rebar3.eclass in 
lanodanOverlay and in ::guru, it appears that the one in ::guru used 
lanodanOverlay's rebar3.eclass as starting point.

- Flow