From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j417RueF019222
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 1 May 2005 07:27:56 GMT
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DS8rw-0001EX-1u
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 May 2005 07:28:00 +0000
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1DS8lr-0001SU-Ro
	for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Sun, 01 May 2005 09:21:43 +0200
Received: from hsdbyk206-163-248-19.sasknet.sk.ca ([206.163.248.19])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sun, 01 May 2005 09:21:43 +0200
Received: from dirtyepic by hsdbyk206-163-248-19.sasknet.sk.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Sun, 01 May 2005 09:21:43 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
From: R Hill <dirtyepic@metawire.org>
Subject: [gentoo-dev]  Re: The usefulness of test in FEATURES
Date:  Sun, 01 May 2005 01:27:12 -0600
Message-ID: <d52019$uff$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <20050430134818.GO8632@kfk4ever.com> <d50mqb$f67$1@sea.gmane.org> <20050501012753.GA2924@tiger.gg3.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version:  1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: hsdbyk206-163-248-19.sasknet.sk.ca
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0+ (X11/20050429)
In-Reply-To: <20050501012753.GA2924@tiger.gg3.net>
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 4cf8f494-dddb-4024-85b3-46584fb11bf7
X-Archives-Hash: 66222300c2c4baba7cc10b0a2ad427af

Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> maillog: 30/04/2005-13:43:42(-0600): R Hill types
> 
>>Maybe a way of lessening the annoyance of test failures would be having 
>>a way to resume the build at the install phase.  I'm thinking of 
>>something similar the touch ${BUILDDIR}/.compiled trick.  as it is, if 
>>you remove test from FEATURES, touch .tested, and then 'ebuild 
>>foo.ebuild install' the tests still run.  This is especially frustrating 
>>when you've just spent 6 hours compiling a package to have it fail 
>>because of sandboxing.
> 
> 
> You probably also need to edit ${T}/environment for the ebuild and
> remove test from FEATURES there as well. In fact, this is *the* location
> that you should probably touch.

Cool.  So this is as simple as "sed -i -e 's@\(^FEATURES.*\) 
test\(.*$\)@\1\2@g' /var/tmp/portage/pkgname/temp/environment" then.

Thanks. =]

--de.


-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list