From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j3SMpdrb008540 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 22:51:40 GMT Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DRHrA-0006zF-3C for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 22:51:40 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DRHla-0004E8-Vi for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:45:55 +0200 Received: from hsdbyk206-163-248-19.sasknet.sk.ca ([206.163.248.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:45:54 +0200 Received: from deemkay by hsdbyk206-163-248-19.sasknet.sk.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:45:54 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: R Hill Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: How well supported is collision-protect? Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:51:18 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20050428002920.GA9023@lion.gg3.net> <1F992DD7-E2C6-464D-ACF1-647B2FBC7624@gentoo.org> <20050428002920.GA9023@lion.gg3.net> <200504272037.10393.vapier@gentoo.org> <20050428011454.GA23848@ols-dell.iic.hokudai.ac.jp> <1114656028.19023.19.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org> <42706C0C.7030905@dir.bg> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: hsdbyk206-163-248-19.sasknet.sk.ca User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0+ (X11/20050427) In-Reply-To: <42706C0C.7030905@dir.bg> Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: d9c3cd28-8711-48f3-a0f5-f860b62953dc X-Archives-Hash: c971491c46c1b57e5f01346d57b3c095 Rumen Yotov wrote: > Can confirm that (much less collisons with 2005.0), but as there exist > some persistant collisions (nvidia-kernel, alsa-driver, some perl > modules, etc.) So i've put these in package.features/package.env file > (from Portage-Toys tools) to disable "collision-protect" just for them. > Also thinking about again begin using "maketest" and do the same for > failing packages, but not sure as there were quite a bit of packages > that didn't pass the "tests". If you do decide to start using the test feature, i've been using bug #73031 is a tracker for system packages (that is, packages included in 'emerge system', not packages in category sys-...). For world packages, you might get a thanks or you might get cussed at and your bug closed as invalid, depending on the maintainer. Best to include patches. ;P -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list