From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-80544-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 069CE139694
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue,  9 May 2017 13:55:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32FB121C07C;
	Tue,  9 May 2017 13:54:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCBB2E0D0D
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  9 May 2017 13:54:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-98-218-46-55.hsd1.md.comcast.net [98.218.46.55])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: mjo)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFFF1341694
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue,  9 May 2017 13:54:46 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <1494185038.1333.2.camel@gentoo.org>
 <52ce2db1-6553-c720-8408-27bdc024e432@gentoo.org>
 <CAGfcS_ncUQKsW-48xF_v0XMf1HVp=a15wtWA5R9MCjiV-Rn+ZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <891aaaa8-e75f-9e84-96f2-cb65490a4a3f@gentoo.org>
 <CAGfcS_=NuesayKd9KnLUfm0BJhHA11iMfXt5JeiQgcOD6PJzJA@mail.gmail.com>
 <b186b5e7-9a17-2370-72e5-13197e48fb45@gentoo.org>
 <89d0964b-12de-20d6-ae1f-778d36ff202f@gentoo.org>
From: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <d275f21e-ad1f-5fb5-5014-91eded5f81fd@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 09:54:44 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.8.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <89d0964b-12de-20d6-ae1f-778d36ff202f@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 92020da1-0595-4d4b-add8-df7b797b32f9
X-Archives-Hash: a6fad4101365aff88299f342770a8c35

On 05/09/2017 09:36 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> 
> Perhaps I'm missing the issue, but can you just follow the dependencies
> and drop keywords accordingly so the tree remains consistent.
> 

If we can make it policy that I'm allowed to edit a bunch of other
peoples' packages and de-keyword stable versions, then yeah; but I don't
think it's allowed currently and I'd probably get some angry emails.