From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7260 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2004 12:11:56 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Aug 2004 12:11:56 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BuVTv-0003bW-Mc for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:11:55 +0000 Received: (qmail 7096 invoked by uid 89); 10 Aug 2004 12:11:55 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 27676 invoked from network); 10 Aug 2004 12:11:55 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:11:45 +0200 From: Radoslaw Stachowiak To: Joerg Hoh Cc: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20040810120404.GB1912@hydra.joerghoh.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040810104326.GB22751@hydra.joerghoh.de> <200408101156.17481.mike@gaima.co.uk> <20040810112318.GA1912@hydra.joerghoh.de> <20040810120404.GB1912@hydra.joerghoh.de> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: extension of etc-update X-Archives-Salt: 4219b384-6e1e-4e95-9458-71a1bfb11386 X-Archives-Hash: c73c0e29d84ef728658d31d67495d67d On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:04:04 +0200, Joerg Hoh wrote: > ctime vs mtime would be acceptable; if it is combined with the > trivial-merge-approach, it's probably enough for most of the mentioned > issues. Ok, i implement it today and publish it for my dev.gentoo.org/~radek/ page for review with announcement here. It will also contain my modification to allow batch-mode work. I use it as apart of my system for semi-automatic management of a few gentoo boxes. -- radoslaw. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list