From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-17291-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1GU5x9-00058d-I7
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:22:15 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k91ILK2u002833;
Sun, 1 Oct 2006 18:21:20 GMT
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k91IJCci007300
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 18:19:12 GMT
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id p27so434572ugc
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 01 Oct 2006 11:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=Y5t6BXEF/CtlwgkFBkfuh4rb+xaob+fbtVie8R/49GGjGT9YyMDJAUiP8GwJRtJGB+eVpSW2D4ufydNNL43ac/OBbwzKATwc/Uwxsvy7DoxvgN2CZzndPoGNjuqu6L07Ji9h6XfHR7vc9YRlA6M8KYMGTaaC0O+I+yvAQi8B0bg=
Received: by 10.66.244.10 with SMTP id r10mr2123296ugh;
Sun, 01 Oct 2006 11:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.245.16 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d18977190610011119h731a88aala756530292e2b0d2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2006 11:19:11 -0700
From: "David Grant" <davidgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: treecleaner removals
In-Reply-To: <451C2FBF.9050004@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_10907_18889261.1159726751994"
References: <A1h3ZVJhntB@v-li.fqdn.th-h.de> <451C2FBF.9050004@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: b4cdf05c-ed87-4545-82e4-1f25f5270e48
X-Archives-Hash: df0a2b5b40e7176ae937b326bae62543
------=_Part_10907_18889261.1159726751994
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On 9/28/06, Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote:
> > Tach David, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
> >
> > David Grant schrieb:
> >> On 9/28/06, Michael Cummings <mcummings@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>> +++ Mark Stier [28/09/06 15:35 +0200]:
> >>>> How about entering the removed ebuilds into bugzilla under an
> adequate
> >>>> section?
> >>> I think my original reply got lost, so just in case - seems like a
> time
> >>> for sunset overlays ;0
> >> or sunrise rather...
> >
> > New packages not yet in the tree -> sunrise
> > Old crufty packages removed from the tree -> sunset
> >
> > Got it?
> >
> > V-Li
> >
>
> There is a TreeCleaner Project overlay; but I was planning on placing
> tools in it; I may be convinced to add the ebuilds (and their files)
> that we clean to it; assuming it doesn't take anyone that long to do it;
> the problem being for some things that live only on our mirrors; the
> ebuilds won't work as the files get purged after two weeks. Let me
> consider this though; if we can script it somehow it would maybe benefit
> others (a treecleaner poopy overlay for Layman also...)
That would be an awesome idea. I have never been a fan of cleaned ebuilds
moving to the CVS attic and I have had to fetch some old ebuild and
associated patches from the portage's CVS Attic on 2 occasions and it was a
major pain.
--
David Grant
http://www.davidgrant.ca
------=_Part_10907_18889261.1159726751994
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/28/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Alec Warner</b> <<a href="mailto:antarus@gentoo.org">antarus@gentoo.org</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote:<br>> Tach David, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)<br>><br>> David Grant schrieb:<br>>> On 9/28/06, Michael Cummings <<a href="mailto:mcummings@gentoo.org">
mcummings@gentoo.org</a>> wrote:<br>>>> +++ Mark Stier [28/09/06 15:35 +0200]:<br>>>>> How about entering the removed ebuilds into bugzilla under an adequate<br>>>>> section?<br>>>> I think my original reply got lost, so just in case - seems like a time
<br>>>> for sunset overlays ;0<br>>> or sunrise rather...<br>><br>> New packages not yet in the tree -> sunrise<br>> Old crufty packages removed from the tree -> sunset<br>><br>> Got it?
<br>><br>> V-Li<br>><br><br>There is a TreeCleaner Project overlay; but I was planning on placing<br>tools in it; I may be convinced to add the ebuilds (and their files)<br>that we clean to it; assuming it doesn't take anyone that long to do it;
<br>the problem being for some things that live only on our mirrors; the<br>ebuilds won't work as the files get purged after two weeks. Let me<br>consider this though; if we can script it somehow it would maybe benefit<br>
others (a treecleaner poopy overlay for Layman also...)</blockquote><div><br><br>That would be an awesome idea. I have never been a fan of cleaned ebuilds moving to the CVS attic and I have had to fetch some old ebuild and associated patches from the portage's CVS Attic on 2 occasions and it was a major pain.
<br></div></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>David Grant<br><a href="http://www.davidgrant.ca">http://www.davidgrant.ca</a>
------=_Part_10907_18889261.1159726751994--
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list