From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21601 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2004 22:31:02 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 16 Jul 2004 22:31:02 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BlbEL-00039w-Vn for arch-gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 22:31:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 2913 invoked by uid 89); 16 Jul 2004 22:31:01 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 27116 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2004 22:31:01 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Joel Konkle-Parker Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 18:30:53 -0400 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-13-194-159.hr.hr.cox.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040702) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Sender: news Subject: [gentoo-dev] Kernel sources thread X-Archives-Salt: 2820c981-5c25-4826-8586-10b29f8a7100 X-Archives-Hash: c2cff008417bc2fa8fd94850fb579e76 As an interested desktop user, I'm curious about the devs' opinions on this recent thread in gentoo-user: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/89620 It appears that there is evidence that devs think that the gentoo-*-sources aren't very high-quality. It seems typical, though, that gentoo users will use the gentoo sources. If this is not correct, which sources should most people use? What do the devs think about gentoo-*-sources? -- Joel Konkle-Parker Webmaster [Ballsome.com] E-mail [jjk3@msstate.edu] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list