Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New category: dev-doc (?)

["Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1289 bytes --]

On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 07:51 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, 07 Jan 2024, Michał Górny wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 17:58 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > I cannot really see a delineation between app-text and [dev]-doc.
> > > 
> > > For example, packages like psmark, xmlto, or even texi2html are general
> > > format manipulation/conversion tools and IMHO app-text is the right
> > > category for them. Also, why would you keep pandoc and manpager in
> > > app-text but move xmlto and mandoc out of it?
> 
> > It's a bit blurry.  My original idea was to keep app-text/ for general-
> > purpose text tools (like text editors), while make dev-doc/ focused on
> > formats specific to documentation (like code documentation, manpages).
> 
> We already have app-editors for text editors. For the rest, it seems
> very blurry indeed and would leave us with (IMHO too many) borderline
> cases.
> 
> You certainly have a point that document processing tools are misplaced
> in app-doc. Maybe just move them to app-text, which would be a more
> minimal change?
> 

I suppose that would work for me.  I'll wait a few more days, though, to
make sure we won't end up moving them twice over a short period.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny


[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 512 bytes --]