Re: [gentoo-dev] Developers, please work on underlinking issues!

[Daniel Campbell <zlg@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1097 bytes --]

On 08/18/2016 06:21 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:13:14 -0400
> Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
>> If you just check your packages occassionally to make sure they build
>> with gold it completely achieves the goal, and it will actually result
>> in fewer bugs using the non-gold linker as well.
> 
> 
> That's what a tinderbox is for. The only QA problem I see here is that
> QA doesn't automate that kind of checks anymore since Diego left. Maybe
> QA should ask Toralf to run a ld.gold tinderbox and avoid asking people
> to randomly test random packages ?
> 
I dunno, if testing packages that one maintains is as simple as
reconfiguring a package, testing, and switching back then I don't think
it's unreasonable to ask us to test our own packages. We're supposed to
do that already, and for packages whose dependencies aren't 100% hashed
out, it can help us figure out what the real deps are.

-- 
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C  1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]