From: Florian Schmaus <flow@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Update on the 23.0 profiles
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2024 13:35:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7386cc8-34c3-4b9b-8033-59252a19df75@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10606960.T7Z3S40VBb@noumea>
[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 731 bytes --]
On 06/04/2024 17.06, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> so here's a small update on the state of the 23.0 profiles:
Thanks for the update and the work on the 23.0 profiles. :)
> Most 17.x profiles have been downgraded to "exp".
I could imagine there is a reason to downgrade those back to 'exp',
could you elaborate a bit on that?
Isn't it bit strange that a 'stable' profiles gets downgraded back to
'exp'? Then again, I am not sure about the implications of this nor
about the rationale behind it.
However, I also notice that there is a outstanding PR that reverts that
[1]. Maybe we should introduce a new state 'oldstable' or so?
- Flow
1: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/35871
[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 17797 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 618 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-07 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-06 15:06 [gentoo-dev] Update on the 23.0 profiles Andreas K. Huettel
2024-04-07 2:03 ` Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-07 12:35 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2024-04-07 12:51 ` Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-07 13:07 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2024-04-08 6:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2024-04-08 12:00 ` [gentoo-dev] " Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-08 15:16 ` Eddie Chapman
2024-04-07 14:48 ` Michał Górny
2024-04-07 21:09 ` Michael Orlitzky
2024-04-08 0:22 ` Alex Boag-Munroe
2024-04-08 3:07 ` Michał Górny
2024-04-07 11:35 ` Florian Schmaus [this message]
2024-04-07 12:31 ` [gentoo-dev] " Madhu
2024-04-07 13:27 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2024-04-11 16:37 ` [gentoo-dev] " Madhu
2024-04-07 12:32 ` [gentoo-dev] " Andreas K. Huettel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7386cc8-34c3-4b9b-8033-59252a19df75@gentoo.org \
--to=flow@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox