From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22BA4138334 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89E92E0959; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BA8FE082B for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (c134-66.icpnet.pl [85.221.134.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8295534C54A; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Create ejabberd project From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 17:53:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20191030054722.44906818@katipo2.lan> References: <20191028111249.233bd53a@computer> <20191028174615.GB6184@cloudsdale.the-delta.net.eu.org> <20191030054722.44906818@katipo2.lan> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9oj5anSQ8jLbJpe0VAzm" User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: a65aedd2-e796-4044-a968-54cfed27fd72 X-Archives-Hash: 405496fbff0f116bef95ab1aa4fda1ea --=-9oj5anSQ8jLbJpe0VAzm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 05:47 +1300, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 18:46:15 +0100 > "Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier" wrote: >=20 > > Wouldn't a Erlang project be better, specially as there is the Perl and= =20 > > Python projects which are there for probably the same reasons? >=20 > I think a "jabber" project would be a more suitable fit for this than > "erlang". >=20 > Then perhaps there can be a subproject of "jabber" for "ejabberd". Why would you create another entirely useless artificial project nobody needs? >=20 > "erlang" is probably too broad in scope. >=20 > If there was an erlang project, then it might be sensible to have > "ejabberd" be co-maintained by erlang. >=20 --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-9oj5anSQ8jLbJpe0VAzm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAl24bodfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM3 NkE4NDUwOTQwOThEMjhDQzhCMjZDNTYzOUFEQUUyMzI5RTI0MEUACgkQY5ra4jKe JA7oGgf+KbXQ3+/0lsRG3/KizqEGm51eWPJNZkc3hcxLEsoo9eQIM6+omkYX9j1d s6v4PuxQ86GJ5PgsbhY2eJRW4rO2ylXfjIo1NwkCnbE9GEzVbgVv+2uVQIgqhV/L oH+/klvlKvdGSGRQS/ZRaNR4KkuEvpr08I14GVmblaWwCE9n851k64iEM6jGYklJ I7JNkPjzFfPqGk1+8Rk8BnD0yXZyageBV7imQX+lqZhWhQaym9DMBvl7dAUI5QDS HqX9OphAzqWyRgij0DBVqkG5pQbKHgMjiLvoPB0GOQz9cBUxajOVfL/i9Qi31aaR jRXQlh/MZwa69JI0MvU4g55EF7m2lQ== =qhSi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9oj5anSQ8jLbJpe0VAzm--