From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23FCC138350 for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF232E089B; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D398E087E for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-98-218-46-55.hsd1.md.comcast.net [98.218.46.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mjo) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 65D6E34E01A for ; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 14:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/2] allow acct-user home directories in /home To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20200120034350.27108-1-mjo@gentoo.org> <3e61620d-4064-d2ae-aefb-e7641de7cf1b@uls.co.za> From: Michael Orlitzky Message-ID: Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 09:57:18 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3e61620d-4064-d2ae-aefb-e7641de7cf1b@uls.co.za> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ed7f8080-a3dd-44d0-b9b5-23e047f405a7 X-Archives-Hash: 9bb4d7a82c6e135ab85f40effdf4311a On 1/21/20 6:44 AM, Jaco Kroon wrote: > > There is technically no real issue, but it's the right thing to do. > > Right, motivations for your proposal for allowing this: > > * You want it. > > Motivations against: > This is dishonest. "I want it" because it improves some things for our users, which you've purposely omitted. I was never going to commit the patch. If anyone wants to discuss the technical merits of using /home, I find it interesting, but please let this thread die and just email me personally or ping me on IRC.