From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-96466-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D3DC158087
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 16:10:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C9F52BC043;
	Mon, 17 Jan 2022 16:10:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CDD52BC03C
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Jan 2022 16:10:33 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <c0adba6e-8b66-0cff-a46a-cdb7b3b44d85@gentoo.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 18:10:28 +0200
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/91.5.0
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Mailing list for ebuild patches? (Was: Re: [PATCH]
 media-libs/freetype: fix GCC usage during configure)
Content-Language: en-US
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
References: <20220107130813.1655260-1-adrian.ratiu@collabora.com>
 <5D7C8FB1-600D-4C3A-9BCA-4CE22DDC8969@gentoo.org>
From: Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <5D7C8FB1-600D-4C3A-9BCA-4CE22DDC8969@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------z1vVOLKjSws0qcRuN0f7ptZn"
X-Archives-Salt: 1ab3e309-bbda-4606-84dc-df3b64c8d51d
X-Archives-Hash: a370b226e1f151d0e6e8c7a717abcdad

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--------------z1vVOLKjSws0qcRuN0f7ptZn
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------JIpUp8ojHtT2iRQbpeAl0PMA";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Joonas Niilola <juippis@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Message-ID: <c0adba6e-8b66-0cff-a46a-cdb7b3b44d85@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Mailing list for ebuild patches? (Was: Re: [PATCH]
 media-libs/freetype: fix GCC usage during configure)
References: <20220107130813.1655260-1-adrian.ratiu@collabora.com>
 <5D7C8FB1-600D-4C3A-9BCA-4CE22DDC8969@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <5D7C8FB1-600D-4C3A-9BCA-4CE22DDC8969@gentoo.org>

--------------JIpUp8ojHtT2iRQbpeAl0PMA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 8.1.2022 7.12, Sam James wrote:
>=20
> FWIW, normally we don't post individual package patches
> to this ML, but it's a good question as to.. where they should go
> if people want to use git send-email/a ML workflow.
>=20
> Right now, sometimes people send them to gentoo-proxy-maint
> (the list) which the proxy maintainers team that handles
> most user contributions looks at, but I'll be honest and say
> our workflow isn't really optimised for it given it's used
> pretty infrequently.
>=20
> Makes me wonder if we should rename the list
> or have a separate one (gentoo-patches?).
>=20
> (Or just use that list and make sure people CC
> maintainers as you did here?)
>=20
> Best,
> sam

I don't think setting up a new mailing list purely for patches will
benefit much. It all comes down to who's gonna merge the contributions,
and Github/bugzilla are definitely easier in that regard. I suggest
opening a bug like normally, and then sending the .patch to the
maintainers directly via e-mail with bug #nr linked either in Subject or
git message body.

-- juippis

--------------JIpUp8ojHtT2iRQbpeAl0PMA--

--------------z1vVOLKjSws0qcRuN0f7ptZn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=J12i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------z1vVOLKjSws0qcRuN0f7ptZn--