From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-4190-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org> Received: (qmail 2733 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Jun 2003 22:20:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 13259 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2003 22:20:28 -0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org From: Cyrik <Cyrik@arcor.de> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 20:35:39 +0200 Message-ID: <bdkn7r$3l8$1@main.gmane.org> References: <87r85fba2o.fsf@killr.ath.cx> <20030627194703.GA404@cerberus.oppresses.us> <1056746975.1164.31.camel@localhost> <1056749877.9103.5.camel@phaze> <20030628182654.54d19e5e.daniel.armyr@home.se> <1056820398.14725.29.camel@nosferatu.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2 Sender: news <news@main.gmane.org> Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-core] proposal: make gentoo-core publicly read-only X-Archives-Salt: a0c87f40-188f-4091-86f0-c9dcf6f7269f X-Archives-Hash: 3ebfc52886388620b0b14936228da466 Martin Schlemmer wrote: > On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 18:26, Daniel Armyr wrote: >> > My point is just this, you want access to -core, become a developer, >> > its part of the territory. >> >> Yeah, and if I want to know how my government makes descisions on how my >> life is run I can allways become a high-ranking politician. At this point >> in time, Gentoo simply does not have an open culture, but a closed one. I >> am fore an read-only core, but when reading this thread I have a nagging >> suspicion that this is pointless. The Gentoo devs want to have an ivory >> tower, and ivory towers can not be scaled. The only way to change is for >> the inhabitants to come out freely. >> >> > And I might be going out on a limb here, but I'm pretty sure that many >> > other non-profit Linux distributions have non-open lists. In fact, I >> > would be very surprised if any Linux distributions don't. >> >> And since then was that an excuse? I thought Gentoo wanted to be better >> than other distros. > > I am guessing you consult your children in all decisions you make > regarding them (if you have any)? Or if you are a manager, do you > consult with your workers in decisions you make ? > > nope but i tell them why i decided like i did and they know of every decision... -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list