From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE97B158041 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 14:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E25F8E2A74; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 14:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62CABE2A22 for ; Sat, 9 Mar 2024 14:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: banning "AI"-backed (LLM/GPT/whatever) contributions to Gentoo From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2024 15:57:12 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87le757phq.fsf@gentoo.org> References: <87le757phq.fsf@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-pPdsM/f6r3RXtZKD5Vt7" User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: f143021e-15c9-4665-8156-5cde35a59660 X-Archives-Hash: f75cf40f861094a12822e30df50a67c5 --=-pPdsM/f6r3RXtZKD5Vt7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 18:04 +0000, Sam James wrote: > I'm a bit worried this is slightly performative - which is not a dig at > you at all - given we can't really enforce it, and it requires honesty, > but that's also not a reason to not try ;) I don't think it's really possible or feasible to reliably detect such contributions, and even if it were, I don't think we want to go as far as to actively pursue anything that looks like one. The point of the policy is rather to make a statement that we don't want these, and to kindly ask users not to do that. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-pPdsM/f6r3RXtZKD5Vt7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAABCgAwFiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAmXseMgSHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEGOa2uIyniQODQ0H/iHHuPvSF8N1I31C4yWjPXE+gGfoxnUc kfnEXGV1HHstiwpabdqWt1APPhSnC6MLjsLTP0+GUl3gqTt79S9sEf+RUtXwnwi/ 6AjU66s8Tusbh1paLWL2O++Z0ukVc0nV/1Ufw2DW6zq9OFMGSUk3oPm5bhHJ07aU dE4j6MfMr7rlPYTvFSqbJMbWCeE7WcFJiauVl0xBKhUT87b4VfCbsafv9uco9LjA t3AKia8qr2UeZRcfXBwh/uMJdwtZuLCm7O06tOzT7YEQC6hy5htfhfE9EFe/1cM0 r3VcZlAnxGtZHOEujXcH3ogiHuDKTehiz08oxYpQQZtBY1vzIoCT4HQ= =taot -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-pPdsM/f6r3RXtZKD5Vt7--