From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-29463-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1JQJ9k-0004iN-Vr
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:16:25 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBDFDE0423;
Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:16:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.242])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95423E0423
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:16:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c8so202584ana.47
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:16:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
bh=c4IUtQ9dRlkHk916eoZMrZmU5/5EQ7x2cPxf3mAyfw8=;
b=D8nOr7S0iVvxmJRgS4nGgVYNGZIxCig76UvXae16kOyCGWHtoVTDtuQfLAbitFdhXW5rKYruB/lfx2lIziRqS3rnLUzPKqOO3vIe6QkKCbV1rOE0MXlK+mMBXm5ZYz5JLdICNedg+6Y/DpJhVNBP2YRT83ncN0ysVZiexIjWJKs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=xBqKlPGx/j3gUY4fGCWiwrbAw3ZN79rSC1VXP0Zi0DaIgAH/Med42KJ3FVbcHGWP2K+Gy5s1/M3Oh6w2YLPXEOnp2YuDB2xxl5Y9MtoCvR3PSfXCttbuBtdVBsxqJaETHJrpHnVWgmgWUmViJHGe/awRaDFiiGi4kouv36cfkog=
Received: by 10.100.252.16 with SMTP id z16mr5887295anh.77.1203153383316;
Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:16:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.226.9 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:16:23 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <b61538820802160116q571ea25dmcdadc7a3628ed706@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:16:23 +0600
From: "Oleg Puchinin" <graycardinalster@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] public system of ratings
In-Reply-To: <47B6A794.4010201@gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <b61538820802160049m31665e31x863163d14b3214d5@mail.gmail.com>
<47B6A794.4010201@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: 523413fa-e348-478d-9c58-82f0d7cd44b5
X-Archives-Hash: b8aa6d4eeba96b8e95e8b60852a2679b
One hundred programmers which only also do that dig in mountain "bugs"
a kind " new package ", it, in my opinion, how to use a steam hammer
to crack nuts. Can it is necessary to make the processes occuring in
Gentoo by more public?
On Feb 16, 2008 3:06 PM, R=E9mi Cardona <remi@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Oleg Puchinin a =E9crit :
> > Day kind!
> > I recently have started to use Gentoo, and I had one question.
> > What for to charge developers of a problem of check of packages?
> > Why to not make public system of ratings? For example voting
>
> We already have such a implicit rating system :) It's called bugzilla.
> Just count the currently open bugs for a given package, that will give
> you a pretty good estimate of how well it {mis,}behaves.
>
> R=E9mi
> --
> gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list