From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39986-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1NpnBY-0002Vr-Ov
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:32:40 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65554E09EB;
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:32:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.147])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36E0E09AB
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:32:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 14so104878qwa.10
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:32:07 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com
Received: by 10.220.124.1 with SMTP id s1mr270752vcr.230.1268332327046; Thu,
11 Mar 2010 10:32:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2e0007041003102104y67c74e4aud6bef3eff1a4b976@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201003041923.17749.Arfrever@gentoo.org>
<4B919F98.2090208@gentoo.org> <20100308212816.GA1309@linux1>
<201003101837.02887.Arfrever@gentoo.org>
<e117dbb91003101443o236ea93bv9c13afae8e8064e8@mail.gmail.com>
<20100311002514.GA19387@linux1>
<e117dbb91003101724scb19d67pde98255894040515@mail.gmail.com>
<20100311023427.GA19680@linux1>
<2e0007041003102104y67c74e4aud6bef3eff1a4b976@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:32:06 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3c45e50e96c516ef
Message-ID: <b41005391003111032s54466886r78ccbe4e6d5675a7@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item
From: Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: 79163943-92fc-42e8-b71f-8fcb99d4f829
X-Archives-Hash: 092f55f87eb8e51680e5ba0b8f71127e
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Jacob Godserv <jacobgodserv@gmail.com> wro=
te:
> The problem here, I think, is everyone has their opinion about what it
> means for something to go stable, and I haven't seen more than one or
> two references to what has been predetermined as policy for
> stabilization. I think we should do a little less debating over
> personal opinions (which is a "hot" topic, apparently) and more about
> how Gentoo guidelines determine what can go stable. If the guidelines
> don't cover this, then they ought to be fixed.
The opinions of most of the people in this thread are not directly
relevant anyway. The maintainer gets to decide when to file a
stablereq bug for their package and the arch teams to get to decide
whether to mark something stable on their arch or not. So someone
just make a decision and move forward; we will never reach consensus
here (and we should not be trying to reach one anyway.)
-A
>
> --
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0Jacob
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0"For then there will be great distress, unequaled
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0from the beginning of the world until now =E2=80=94 and neve=
r
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0elect those days will be shortened."
>
> =C2=A0 =C2=A0Are you ready?
>
>