From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-34524-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Lc0Mp-00018h-E1
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:42:47 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43CF7E046B;
	Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:42:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gx0-f175.google.com (mail-gx0-f175.google.com [209.85.217.175])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1DFE046B
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:42:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gxk23 with SMTP id 23so7643544gxk.10
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:42:44 -0800 (PST)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com
Received: by 10.142.156.2 with SMTP id d2mr2618379wfe.64.1235493764293; Tue, 
	24 Feb 2009 08:42:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20090224163726.781bba19@snowcone>
References: <1234257125.18160.2016.camel@localhost>
	 <49A26B84.7040006@gentoo.org>
	 <1235383347.12908.0.camel@neuromancer.neuronics-tp.ch>
	 <efeb8d230902230228s1e9f1f06ja5e1e90f5f13d005@mail.gmail.com>
	 <49A2B276.1000109@gentoo.org> <49A41D3F.4010706@gentoo.org>
	 <b41005390902240821x26b94465w73dbe308dfb85396@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20090224162341.149c49a7@snowcone>
	 <b41005390902240833l3bcf7380i301b6344525085b9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20090224163726.781bba19@snowcone>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:42:44 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 76c5861921b26844
Message-ID: <b41005390902240842s319b0091hb3d47dc8351d48d7@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] 
	Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009)
From: Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: c2c6f78c-bdcf-4481-98da-d929632bb2fd
X-Archives-Hash: f675730be4047181588dba4c07af74b1

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
<ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:33:19 -0800
> Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> Hey I never said its a perfect solution; but I'm a fan of the 'it
>> covers 80%'.   Sometimes you can't have your cake and eat it too;
>> sometimes requirements get dropped.
>
> We can cover 100% with a solution with less of an impact. There's no
> need to compromise here.

Two years to argue and implement a solution certainly shouts "compromise" to me.

-A

>
> --
> Ciaran McCreesh
>