[gentoo-dev] Do you use repoman (lfull|last)?

[gentoo-dev] Do you use repoman (lfull|last)?

[Alec Warner]

If you *use* or *want* to keep this mode of repoman; please comment on
the bug[1].

If you do *not* use or do *not* want to keep this mode of repoman, do nothing.

This is an informal means to see if anyone is using repoman full or
repoman lfull; if it turns out not I hope to cut a patch to remove
them; because they are kind of silly.

If you care about previous repoman results; I highly suggest running
repoman and saving the output to a file using simple shell constructs,
nohup, screen, or script.

[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=247548

[gentoo-dev] Re: Do you use repoman (lfull|last)?

[Alec Warner]

On 11/19/08, Alec Warner <antarus@gentoo.org> wrote:
> If you *use* or *want* to keep this mode of repoman; please comment on
>  the bug[1].
>
>  If you do *not* use or do *not* want to keep this mode of repoman, do nothing.
>
>  This is an informal means to see if anyone is using repoman full or
>  repoman lfull; if it turns out not I hope to cut a patch to remove
>  them; because they are kind of silly.

As pointed out by many 'repoman full' was a typo and I meant 'repoman
last.'  Sorry for the confusion :(

>
>  If you care about previous repoman results; I highly suggest running
>  repoman and saving the output to a file using simple shell constructs,
>  nohup, screen, or script.
>
>  [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=247548
>