From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KoC0l-0006t8-9I for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:02:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B80FE0516; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com (yx-out-1718.google.com [74.125.44.153]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD05E0516 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 4so135998yxp.46 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.41.14 with SMTP id t14mr1664810ybj.157.1223622124315; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.220.10 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:02:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:02:04 -0700 From: "Alec Warner" Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for October In-Reply-To: <20081009195525.308ce1f5@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081001093002.1D4C26503A@smtp.gentoo.org> <20081009142554.GA10351@comet> <20081009195525.308ce1f5@googlemail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: bf7ab506aead113f X-Archives-Salt: 0de66408-d0c1-44d0-9012-43aa36268af8 X-Archives-Hash: a13c96bb24ce7333fa29c76b5d27716e On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 09:25:55 -0500 > Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> On 05:30 Wed 01 Oct , Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even >> > vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole >> > Gentoo dev list to see. >> >> Nothing was submitted, so there will be no meeting today. We'll have >> a meeting in 2 weeks if anything comes up or if I missed something >> that for some reason was not posted in response to the usual >> announcement thread. > > I'm guessing it's too late to ask the Council to discuss the "EAPI 2 is > brokened :(" thread? What would be the earliest the Council would be > able to make a decision upon that? Unfortunately it's something that > could get messy if left for too long. All I see in the thread is you bringing up a known issue and then everyone telling you it will be fixed or is in the process of being fixed. What kind of improvements are you looking for? Be specific. > > -- > Ciaran McCreesh >