From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KIAnx-0007eq-RK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:16:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC073E0267; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:16:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com (yw-out-1718.google.com [74.125.46.153]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99EF5E0267 for ; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:16:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 5so2124301ywm.46 for ; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.201.2 with SMTP id y2mr19209727ybf.225.1215990983271; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.202.13 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 16:16:23 -0700 From: "Alec Warner" Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting summary for 10 July 2008 In-Reply-To: <20080713235255.0e2b7f8e@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080713071118.GC1891@comet> <20080713235255.0e2b7f8e@googlemail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: e187f108e9116070 X-Archives-Salt: 0f515854-5ed0-44c7-af8d-977d8efeb77e X-Archives-Hash: 6a01cb2b3c3496189c69d71a597a5c1f On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:11:18 -0700 > Donnie Berkholz wrote: >> GLEP 55: On hold pending a concrete requirement for it. GLEP 54 may >> be, but that's unclear until it's been revised. > > Which part of the 'Problem' section in the GLEP didn't you understand? > Do you seriously consider not being able to add or change global scope > functions in future EAPIs to be a non-issue, or were you ignoring those > two bullet points? I understood both. As far as could be determined by the members at the meeting there no compelling examples in Gentoo who to change or add global scope functions in future EAPIs. As such those problems as stated are not in scope for Gentoo because Gentoo is not attempting to do those things at this time. > > -- > Ciaran McCreesh > -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list