From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-28698-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1JCQvb-0007S0-7V
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:44:27 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F13CE0C72;
	Wed,  9 Jan 2008 02:44:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28E1E0C72
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  9 Jan 2008 02:44:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so69148fga.14
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:44:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.78.168.1 with SMTP id q1mr40046hue.76.1199846662854;
        Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:44:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.78.33.13 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 18:44:22 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <b41005390801081844i140cab33rd885f0fc292b2f9b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 18:44:22 -0800
From: "Alec Warner" <antarus@gentoo.org>
Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January
In-Reply-To: <20080109024125.3bfc9479@snowcone>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org>
	 <20080105043233.0935d2f8@snowcone>
	 <61307.68.54.223.178.1199541823.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com>
	 <20080106003356.46087fef@snowcone> <flr3i7$odg$1@ger.gmane.org>
	 <20080106233412.5875626f@snowcone>
	 <1199829889.8108.12.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org>
	 <20080109021735.42cd3856@snowcone>
	 <1199846287.8108.143.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org>
	 <20080109024125.3bfc9479@snowcone>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: a7f1653dd29b59e9
X-Archives-Salt: 0c7e2304-d6f6-436b-8839-95680bd4fc70
X-Archives-Hash: 7a233cffa5a4d82d8a75759573e4c5e3

On 1/8/08, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:38:07 -0800
> Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 02:17 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > Oh. Yeah. Because people with an attitude like yours think that the
> > > correct way to fix a repoman message is to start nuking arch
> > > keywords, ignoring what it does to the rest of the tree.
> >
> > ...for the architecture in question which is proving incapable of
> > keeping up with the state of the tree as it is...
> >
> > Sorry, you fail.
>
> Uh... So where do the original problems come from? Are you saying that
> packages mysteriously start breaking on their own because no-one's
> maintaining them?

Of course they do
-- 
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list