From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCQvb-0007S0-7V for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:44:27 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1F13CE0C72; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 02:44:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28E1E0C72 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2008 02:44:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so69148fga.14 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:44:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.168.1 with SMTP id q1mr40046hue.76.1199846662854; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:44:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.33.13 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 18:44:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 18:44:22 -0800 From: "Alec Warner" Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January In-Reply-To: <20080109024125.3bfc9479@snowcone> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080101103002.083C4652C4@smtp.gentoo.org> <20080105043233.0935d2f8@snowcone> <61307.68.54.223.178.1199541823.squirrel@www.aei-tech.com> <20080106003356.46087fef@snowcone> <20080106233412.5875626f@snowcone> <1199829889.8108.12.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20080109021735.42cd3856@snowcone> <1199846287.8108.143.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> <20080109024125.3bfc9479@snowcone> X-Google-Sender-Auth: a7f1653dd29b59e9 X-Archives-Salt: 0c7e2304-d6f6-436b-8839-95680bd4fc70 X-Archives-Hash: 7a233cffa5a4d82d8a75759573e4c5e3 On 1/8/08, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:38:07 -0800 > Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 02:17 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > Oh. Yeah. Because people with an attitude like yours think that the > > > correct way to fix a repoman message is to start nuking arch > > > keywords, ignoring what it does to the rest of the tree. > > > > ...for the architecture in question which is proving incapable of > > keeping up with the state of the tree as it is... > > > > Sorry, you fail. > > Uh... So where do the original problems come from? Are you saying that > packages mysteriously start breaking on their own because no-one's > maintaining them? Of course they do -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list