[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/ncdu: ChangeLog ncdu-1.3.ebuild

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/ncdu: ChangeLog ncdu-1.3.ebuild

[Donnie Berkholz]

On 08:51 Wed 03 Oct     , Wolfram Schlich (wschlich) wrote:
> 1.1                  sys-fs/ncdu/ncdu-1.3.ebuild
> 
> file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/ncdu/ncdu-1.3.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/ncdu/ncdu-1.3.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain

> src_compile() {
> 	econf || die "configure failed"
> 	emake || die "make failed"
> }

This is the default, delete it.

Thanks,
Donnie
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/ncdu: ChangeLog ncdu-1.3.ebuild

[Wolfram Schlich]

* Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org> [2007-10-03 10:55]:
> On 08:51 Wed 03 Oct     , Wolfram Schlich (wschlich) wrote:
> > 1.1                  sys-fs/ncdu/ncdu-1.3.ebuild
> > 
> > file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/ncdu/ncdu-1.3.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> > plain: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/ncdu/ncdu-1.3.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
> 
> > src_compile() {
> > 	econf || die "configure failed"
> > 	emake || die "make failed"
> > }
> 
> This is the default, delete it.

Thanks, fixed :)

And *please*, don't send such mails to this
list *and* to my address in addition.

Thanks,
Wolfram
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/ncdu: ChangeLog ncdu-1.3.ebuild

[Mike Frysinger]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 813 bytes --]

On Wednesday 03 October 2007, Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> * Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org> [2007-10-03 10:55]:
> > On 08:51 Wed 03 Oct     , Wolfram Schlich (wschlich) wrote:
> > > 1.1                  sys-fs/ncdu/ncdu-1.3.ebuild
> > >
> > > file :
> > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/ncdu/ncdu-1.3.eb
> > >uild?rev=1.1&view=markup plain:
> > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/ncdu/ncdu-1.3.eb
> > >uild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
> > >
> > > src_compile() {
> > > 	econf || die "configure failed"
> > > 	emake || die "make failed"
> > > }
> >
> > This is the default, delete it.
>
> Thanks, fixed :)
>
> And *please*, don't send such mails to this
> list *and* to my address in addition.

this is done on purpose, please see the archives as to why
-mike

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 827 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/ncdu: ChangeLog ncdu-1.3.ebuild

[Donnie Berkholz]

On 12:43 Wed 03 Oct     , Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> And *please*, don't send such mails to this
> list *and* to my address in addition.

You can add a procmail rule to detect duplicates using a cache and 
checking Message-Id, with formail. Examples of this are all over the 
place. It's a useful rule to have for many reasons besides this.

Thanks,
Donnie
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/ncdu: ChangeLog ncdu-1.3.ebuild

[Wolfram Schlich]

* Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org> [2007-10-03 19:12]:
> On 12:43 Wed 03 Oct     , Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> > And *please*, don't send such mails to this
> > list *and* to my address in addition.
> 
> You can add a procmail rule to detect duplicates using a cache and 
> checking Message-Id, with formail. Examples of this are all over the 
> place. It's a useful rule to have for many reasons besides this.

Yeah, but it's unpredictable *which* one of the two mails makes
it first onto my system, thus the one *not* sent to the list might
end up in my INBOX and the one sent to the list, that would have
been correctly delivered to the mailbox for this list, would be
deleted by procmail because it would be recognized as the duplicate.
So that is just not a solution.

I will instead filter mails sent by @gentoo.org addresses that have
'\[gentoo-commits\]' in their subjects but no List-Id: header.
Bad luck for everyone who sends such mails *only* to me.
-- 
Regards,
Wolfram Schlich <wschlich@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/ncdu: ChangeLog ncdu-1.3.ebuild

[Josh Sled]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1335 bytes --]

Wolfram Schlich <wschlich@gentoo.org> writes:
> * Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org> [2007-10-03 19:12]:
>> On 12:43 Wed 03 Oct     , Wolfram Schlich wrote:
>> > And *please*, don't send such mails to this
>> > list *and* to my address in addition.
>> 
>> You can add a procmail rule to detect duplicates using a cache and 
>> checking Message-Id, with formail. Examples of this are all over the 
>> place. It's a useful rule to have for many reasons besides this.
>
> Yeah, but it's unpredictable *which* one of the two mails makes
> it first onto my system, thus the one *not* sent to the list might

Sigh.

It is the same message, addressed To/Cc: you and/or the list, no matter which
one is delivered first.  So just put all list(+private) filtering before
personal filtering.

E.g.,

    # filter duplicate-message delivery; see procmailex
    # "The more you know."
    :0 Wh: msgid.lock
    | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache

    :0 He
    * ^(to|from|cc):.*gentoo-dev
    lists/gentoo-dev/

    # other public mailing lists (more general, least specific)

    # other private filters      (less general, most specific)

    # some might call the following 'inbox'...
    :0
    otherwise-unfiltered/ 

-- 
...jsled
http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo ${a}@${b}

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/ncdu: ChangeLog ncdu-1.3.ebuild

[Alec Warner]

On 10/3/07, Josh Sled <jsled@asynchronous.org> wrote:
> Wolfram Schlich <wschlich@gentoo.org> writes:
> > * Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org> [2007-10-03 19:12]:
> >> On 12:43 Wed 03 Oct     , Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> >> > And *please*, don't send such mails to this
> >> > list *and* to my address in addition.
> >>
> >> You can add a procmail rule to detect duplicates using a cache and
> >> checking Message-Id, with formail. Examples of this are all over the
> >> place. It's a useful rule to have for many reasons besides this.
> >
> > Yeah, but it's unpredictable *which* one of the two mails makes
> > it first onto my system, thus the one *not* sent to the list might
>
> Sigh.
>
> It is the same message, addressed To/Cc: you and/or the list, no matter which
> one is delivered first.  So just put all list(+private) filtering before
> personal filtering.
>
> E.g.,
>
>     # filter duplicate-message delivery; see procmailex
>     # "The more you know."
>     :0 Wh: msgid.lock
>     | formail -D 8192 msgid.cache
>
>     :0 He
>     * ^(to|from|cc):.*gentoo-dev
>     lists/gentoo-dev/
>
>     # other public mailing lists (more general, least specific)
>
>     # other private filters      (less general, most specific)
>
>     # some might call the following 'inbox'...
>     :0
>     otherwise-unfiltered/
>
> --
> ...jsled
> http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo ${a}@${b}
>
>

What about those of us suffering with Outlook!??!

-Alec
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/ncdu: ChangeLog ncdu-1.3.ebuild

[Chris Gianelloni]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 384 bytes --]

On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 07:57 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> What about those of us suffering with Outlook!??!

Umm... woodpecker has procmail on it.  Every developer has access to
procmail.  Also, nobody forces you to use Outlook.

-- 
Chris Gianelloni
Release Engineering Strategic Lead
Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
Games Developer/Foundation Trustee
Gentoo Foundation

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/ncdu: ChangeLog ncdu-1.3.ebuild

[Robert Buchholz]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1091 bytes --]

On Thursday, 4. October 2007, Josh Sled wrote:
> Wolfram Schlich <wschlich@gentoo.org> writes:
> > * Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org> [2007-10-03 19:12]:
> >> On 12:43 Wed 03 Oct     , Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> >> > And *please*, don't send such mails to this
> >> > list *and* to my address in addition.
> >>
> >> You can add a procmail rule to detect duplicates using a cache and
> >> checking Message-Id, with formail. Examples of this are all over
> >> the place. It's a useful rule to have for many reasons besides
> >> this.
> >
> > Yeah, but it's unpredictable *which* one of the two mails makes
> > it first onto my system, thus the one *not* sent to the list might
>
> Sigh.
>
> It is the same message, addressed To/Cc: you and/or the list, no
> matter which one is delivered first.  So just put all list(+private)
> filtering before personal filtering.

That doesn't work when filtering for List-Id headers which can be nicely 
used with regex matching like so:

# Gentoo lists
:0
* ^List-Id: .*[<]gentoo-\/[^.]+
.gentoo.gentoo-$MATCH/


Robert

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-fs/ncdu: ChangeLog ncdu-1.3.ebuild

[Wolfram Schlich]

* Robert Buchholz <rbu@gentoo.org> [2007-10-08 05:53]:
> On Thursday, 4. October 2007, Josh Sled wrote:
> > Wolfram Schlich <wschlich@gentoo.org> writes:
> > > * Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org> [2007-10-03 19:12]:
> > >> On 12:43 Wed 03 Oct     , Wolfram Schlich wrote:
> > >> > And *please*, don't send such mails to this
> > >> > list *and* to my address in addition.
> > >>
> > >> You can add a procmail rule to detect duplicates using a cache and
> > >> checking Message-Id, with formail. Examples of this are all over
> > >> the place. It's a useful rule to have for many reasons besides
> > >> this.
> > >
> > > Yeah, but it's unpredictable *which* one of the two mails makes
> > > it first onto my system, thus the one *not* sent to the list might
> >
> > Sigh.
> >
> > It is the same message, addressed To/Cc: you and/or the list, no
> > matter which one is delivered first.  So just put all list(+private)
> > filtering before personal filtering.
> 
> That doesn't work when filtering for List-Id headers which can be nicely 
> used with regex matching like so:
> [...]

Yup, I *only* filter mailing lists by list related headers like List-Id:
and others -- filtering list mails by To:/Cc:/Subject: headers is
broken by design.

My current gentoo-commits reply spamfilter looks like this:
--8<--
## Gentoo spam
:0
* ^From:.*@gentoo\.org
* ^Subject.*\[gentoo-commits\]
* ! ^List-Id:
/dev/null
--8<--
-- 
Regards,
Wolfram Schlich <wschlich@gentoo.org>
Gentoo Linux * http://dev.gentoo.org/~wschlich/
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list