From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-26790-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1IchjY-0000g4-R1
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:24:21 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l92DDrZs003546;
	Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:13:53 GMT
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l92DASAC031097
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:10:28 GMT
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so3015385nfh
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 06:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.171.13 with SMTP id t13mr4533197hue.1191330626973;
        Tue, 02 Oct 2007 06:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.52.6 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 06:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b41005390710020610j689eba35q968878527bfd17de@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 06:10:26 -0700
From: "Alec Warner" <antarus@gentoo.org>
Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: sh versionator.eclass
In-Reply-To: <pan.2007.10.02.12.58.53@cox.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200710012259.40589.uberlord@gentoo.org>
	 <200710020539.33189.vapier@gentoo.org>
	 <1191320664.6284.49.camel@uberlaptop.marples.name>
	 <200710020657.25080.vapier@gentoo.org>
	 <1191324510.6284.107.camel@uberlaptop.marples.name>
	 <pan.2007.10.02.12.58.53@cox.net>
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4d1cfcb73754a742
X-Archives-Salt: d718aa3a-912a-452b-b738-fe06281d059f
X-Archives-Hash: 79af0b99d1eca5e87b9c06b7e7fe8455

On 10/2/07, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
> Roy Marples <uberlord@gentoo.org> posted
> 1191324510.6284.107.camel@uberlaptop.marples.name, excerpted below, on
> Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:28:30 +0100:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 06:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> i am convinced by superior standards and by good things.  forcing the
> >> standard from bash to POSIX is neither of these.  i dont see that as a
> >> flaw in my logic.
> >
> > Forcing? I'm not asking for anything to be forced, I'm asking for it to
> > be allowed.
>
> Why is this still here on dev?  The thread has long ago become more
> political than technical, it should be on project now.
>
> I'm also rather disappointed no one else has asked that it be taken there
> yet, considering all the protest there was on non-tech discussion here.
> Where did all those folks go?

Obviously because this thread is about reviewing a sh based
versionator.eclass which belongs on -dev ;)

>
> --
> Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
> and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list