From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IchjY-0000g4-R1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:24:21 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l92DDrZs003546; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:13:53 GMT Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l92DASAC031097 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:10:28 GMT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so3015385nfh for ; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 06:10:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.171.13 with SMTP id t13mr4533197hue.1191330626973; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 06:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.52.6 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 06:10:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 06:10:26 -0700 From: "Alec Warner" Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: sh versionator.eclass In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200710012259.40589.uberlord@gentoo.org> <200710020539.33189.vapier@gentoo.org> <1191320664.6284.49.camel@uberlaptop.marples.name> <200710020657.25080.vapier@gentoo.org> <1191324510.6284.107.camel@uberlaptop.marples.name> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4d1cfcb73754a742 X-Archives-Salt: d718aa3a-912a-452b-b738-fe06281d059f X-Archives-Hash: 79af0b99d1eca5e87b9c06b7e7fe8455 On 10/2/07, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > Roy Marples posted > 1191324510.6284.107.camel@uberlaptop.marples.name, excerpted below, on > Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:28:30 +0100: > > > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 06:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> i am convinced by superior standards and by good things. forcing the > >> standard from bash to POSIX is neither of these. i dont see that as a > >> flaw in my logic. > > > > Forcing? I'm not asking for anything to be forced, I'm asking for it to > > be allowed. > > Why is this still here on dev? The thread has long ago become more > political than technical, it should be on project now. > > I'm also rather disappointed no one else has asked that it be taken there > yet, considering all the protest there was on non-tech discussion here. > Where did all those folks go? Obviously because this thread is about reviewing a sh based versionator.eclass which belongs on -dev ;) > > -- > Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. > "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- > and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman > > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > > -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list