From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IU7RG-00061s-9B for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 21:01:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l88Krkq6010826; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 20:53:46 GMT Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l88KoPY9005969 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 20:50:25 GMT Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 30so620316nfu for ; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 13:50:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.181.13 with SMTP id d13mr1186812huf.1189284624268; Sat, 08 Sep 2007 13:50:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.23.17 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Sep 2007 13:50:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 13:50:24 -0700 From: "Alec Warner" Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-commits list lives! In-Reply-To: <20070908140744.15324548@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20070907070136.GM22695@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net> <20070908140744.15324548@localhost> X-Google-Sender-Auth: a75c43794b37b5b9 X-Archives-Salt: 1d9b7471-350a-4736-88ca-995f25491904 X-Archives-Hash: f2bd46d04e697fda75a760961ddbc2c1 On 9/8/07, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > "Robin H. Johnson" : > > > After much toiling, Infra has finally got the commits list active. > > Kudos to you all! > > What we now need is the installation of some kind of peer review. For > example add to the recruitment guide a recommendation to watch the > recruitee one mentored on the commits mailing list. > All other commits should be reviewed. Arch work is normally > done in a team and all teams watch each other, so that works quite > good, as keywords are done wrong far too often. > Any ideas about an efficient way to establish such a process? > Can we see how often the list gets used first? Maybe things will improve in the next bit of time and we don't need any extra formal process. I have no problem adding to the guide that mentors should watch mentees commits (that is technically already required even though many do not). I'd rather have a bunch of people pointing out problems on commits in an ad-hoc manner than have 'All Commits Reviewed(TM)' ;) -Alec -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list