From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GewNp-00043b-1s for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:22:37 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9VGKYTe023915; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:20:34 GMT Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9VGGWTZ000026 for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:16:32 GMT Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id p27so1497190ugc for ; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:16:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Uw7iLoCq7cnxa+oOeX1ZGIRTfTJGy6Bls2YYRzRyxQnI1qbKnjhx5LtY3zD77izcFSnItLXFh+jA3j/Ienz+f8tusU/AOdB5aLMA5vnC8zgxs8VsBlr2Nh6X+JwDD4c7oAKtm792MehuXlUaB7q5bXTROUUmqIPSbGa+ogu9OFI= Received: by 10.78.193.19 with SMTP id q19mr7088371huf; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:16:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.126.11 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:16:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:16:31 +0100 From: "Stuart Herbert" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees In-Reply-To: <454773F6.9020605@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45468ED1.8050107@gentoo.org> <20061031003334.50376630@snowdrop.home> <200610310857.02169.linux@quanteam.info> <20061031150236.7b080211@snowdrop.home> <454773F6.9020605@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 86b6bbd7-f408-45cf-8bf0-4c62cc709109 X-Archives-Hash: 2ef78262b158539be501870b1f9c5ffa On 10/31/06, Stephen P. Becker wrote: > You do realize that Ciaran *was* a member of several arch teams, right? Of course. But "was" _is_ the operative word. It's not like I'm asking for him to be banned from the Gentoo mailing lists or anything. Chill, ffs. Arch team leaders set policy on this issues, not Ciaran. It's useful for developers (especially ones who have joined Gentoo since Ciaran was expelled) to be clear on what the arch team policies actually are. > I would agree with pretty much everything he has said on this topic. > Perhaps you should consider that the reason that not many arch team > folks have chipped in is because we agree with him. All I'm asking is for arch team leaders to say so. It's hardly unreasonable or controversial to ask that. > Don't dismiss his > responses as noise from some random "Gentoo user" who has no idea what > they are talking about. You should know better then that Stuart. I'm not dismissing his responses. I'm just asking for arch team leaders (which is who the questions in this thread were addressed to) to chip in, tis all. Which, I'm glad to say, they've been happy to do. Best regards, Stu -- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list