From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-17669-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1GXwZi-0005Td-IS
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:09:59 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k9C98iwm003813;
Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:08:44 GMT
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k9C96IZh018997
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 09:06:19 GMT
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x30so482892nfb
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 02:06:19 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=c573jGExbn+3NS5mi2enuwae0NSvKQBLshgnaHz8BQXK2MWpXh/w5f0FOY/syWo7gHPWJDAElW4wydcP3rh+ToEyDY2NGXAyWusTAnDCl0EquSp3DEnHGKBb26KwyRlE3E8JZr+rht4Z0ssblfp8b9cmOy2vGeCYr+U8DoMdym8=
Received: by 10.78.157.8 with SMTP id f8mr1939349hue;
Thu, 12 Oct 2006 02:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.78.126.11 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Oct 2006 02:00:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b38c6f4c0610120200h82aaf1cocb47565cf3110ba8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:00:05 +0100
From: "Stuart Herbert" <stuart.herbert@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42?
In-Reply-To: <20061011221729.4293775e@snowdrop.home>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <51c6d3c5867563dbcdcc62370def11d0@myrddraal.demon.co.uk>
<452D2BC9.5060207@gentoo.org>
<15FCAB01-0915-4FB7-BD31-189212346F96@gentoo.org>
<20061011194442.4c0bd8d9@snowdrop.home>
<1160595003.10524.21.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org>
<20061011204619.0c58fdf1@snowdrop.home>
<Pine.LNX.4.61.0610111551180.1206@rutrow.coat.com>
<20061011212633.30942d25@snowdrop.home>
<b38c6f4c0610111408k61ee8effqb75e13665c94049d@mail.gmail.com>
<20061011221729.4293775e@snowdrop.home>
X-Archives-Salt: 83b11922-c965-42d0-89d0-01315a595484
X-Archives-Hash: da83cecd8167991fd6a3c9d93e310c07
On 10/11/06, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@ciaranm.org> wrote:
> Not an issue for me. It's an issue for random people writing scripts,
> for people using command line things and for people who don't want to
> use a full parser framework for some quick hack. There's no need to
> make things harder for random developers here.
Wouldn't a resolver API be the better approach to solving that? We're
not here to support x-random number of independent, unofficial
implementations of atom parsers.
Best regards,
Stu
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list