From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GJvAy-0002xX-8X for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2006 16:50:28 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k83GmXWx008637; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 16:48:33 GMT Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.233]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k83GiWPn001522 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 16:44:33 GMT Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r21so1783876wxc for ; Sun, 03 Sep 2006 09:44:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cBfSWuYdv42hIxsvHqIeyc9Zv2GVgDpCgb6IvMhjzatwNDfYYdqeAIxfAjZ81Msi5QSPbluwhLNydaSMA2X04tS2HjAzbGz4Od8v0/xcg4knDLYOmCTkXvQJhRPTgoGX3auus5lvTSD+aF0AK/EfZ4TVuIdEdHoI1Ety6XrxZLY= Received: by 10.90.78.9 with SMTP id a9mr1028262agb; Sun, 03 Sep 2006 09:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.96.11 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 09:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 17:44:32 +0100 From: "Stuart Herbert" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 2006.1 In-Reply-To: <44FAECE8.5060309@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44F95E3E.9000708@gentoo.org> <44F96559.6010003@gentoo.org> <44F96881.90806@gentoo.org> <44F98E43.5040307@gentoo.org> <44FA15D1.2020209@gentoo.org> <44FAE883.8090107@gentoo.org> <8a0028260609030742q3e908e3du9cd25caab0379753@mail.gmail.com> <44FAECE8.5060309@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: feb8248b-67cf-4049-bdb1-b75e99afa52a X-Archives-Hash: 7735920cdd9a59fd34e62a1ec9bf669c On 9/3/06, Alec Warner wrote: > Because the thought that stable is always "stable" or that because we > released things are "stable" is incorrect ;) You're not supposed to break the stable tree; that surely must include stabilising a compiler (which is the _default_ for new installs) that can't compile all the packages marked stable for your arch. Feels like one rule for one group (the package maintainers) and another for another group (releng / x86 arch team) to me. Best regards, Stu -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list