From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GJv7f-0003jE-0g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2006 16:47:03 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k83Gipnx028635; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 16:44:51 GMT Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.227]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k83Gewod004941 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 16:40:58 GMT Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r21so1783178wxc for ; Sun, 03 Sep 2006 09:40:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=T+HHy33Kyinj3C6WWmjVUujK6e2nD6cRe83HJ0BU5mMcQvuuI+Hi53PrH/bBrzuLsHWjpAlZ0AWbFo9vRRXojhgEdIircJbRspQbtCIc0wU5wLH5Rp99eJiUYmBe5kUKVHpWsg1l6s1nTamuK5ao1QEA6twjWApijdv0NBnCb/0= Received: by 10.90.25.7 with SMTP id 7mr1015098agy; Sun, 03 Sep 2006 09:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.96.11 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Sep 2006 09:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 17:40:57 +0100 From: "Stuart Herbert" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 2006.1 In-Reply-To: <44FAE883.8090107@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44F95E3E.9000708@gentoo.org> <44F96559.6010003@gentoo.org> <44F96881.90806@gentoo.org> <44F98E43.5040307@gentoo.org> <44FA15D1.2020209@gentoo.org> <44FAE883.8090107@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 10986235-6fa6-423d-a89c-ebd87e642b1a X-Archives-Hash: 36ee4f290146882d9a8253133fde6372 On 9/3/06, Alec Warner wrote: > in the end > GCC-4.1 going stable is up to releng and arch teams (heck it doesn't > technically have to go stable on all arches). So who "screwed up" in > this case? Well, for a package like PHP, the package maintainers take responsibility for ensuring that there are useful and adequate announcements up front. GCC I suspect is surrounded by more confusion. Either the package maintainers or the arch teams could have made an announcement giving fair warning; alas, neither did. Best regards, Stu -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list