From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GJek9-00041v-Dz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 23:17:41 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with SMTP id k82NGVEX020563; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 23:16:31 GMT Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.231]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k82NEA58006392 for ; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 23:14:10 GMT Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id r21so1614245wxc for ; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 16:14:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iLqRCFX2tijSrLAMzxRD39FGqTVRVoa8c8SjYCcgD2PJ/P5umVP0HCyRoTqUWaOOzsd/TmdmPmakueQyi3WkFSg4HxUY9d07kzudabAE0zBAG5zPOmadmXDLLsm+88uADj9WLzxXvkYYXm1TcPMJsK0IWM53Y7McvDxGNU3nvfE= Received: by 10.90.56.14 with SMTP id e14mr957937aga; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 16:14:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.96.11 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 16:14:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 00:14:10 +0100 From: "Stuart Herbert" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 2006.1 In-Reply-To: <46059ce10609021529q2ccf2db0k22666f295f287824@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44F95E3E.9000708@gentoo.org> <44F96559.6010003@gentoo.org> <44F96881.90806@gentoo.org> <44F98E43.5040307@gentoo.org> <46059ce10609021529q2ccf2db0k22666f295f287824@mail.gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 2f2d3109-d85b-4168-b77c-27325fcfe86f X-Archives-Hash: b952961b72e46e62de8f7357b82668aa On 9/2/06, Dan Meltzer wrote: > On 9/2/06, Stuart Herbert wrote: > > On 9/2/06, Alec Warner wrote: > > > Give us about 3000 more developers, and sure* ;) > > > > I don't think that that's good thing to be saying to our users. > > Is it a bad thing to be saying to your developers? It wasn't said to developers, it was said to a user. > The gcc-4.1 stabilization bug has been open for a month and a half. That's great, but that's not an announcement. Folks aren't going to go digging through bugs to find stuff like this. > Thats fairly good notice... Only to the folks who knew about that bug. For the wider community ... it's not notice. > Warnings have also appeared on > planet.gentoo.org, and in the GWN. Tsunam posted that there was a push on to get gcc-4.1 stable, but there was no target date, and no firm statement that said it would definitely be happening. He posted this on July 19th. Was there another warning, with dates and stuff? The GWN warning was last week. My apologies if there was an earlier one that I missed. My apologies, but I've been unable to find an announcement on -dev. Best regards, Stu -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list