From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-13491-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1FoSmN-0006sa-Uf
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 22:15:04 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id k58MB1dS030647;
	Thu, 8 Jun 2006 22:11:01 GMT
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k58M3l6r009386
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 22:03:47 GMT
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k26so453503nfc
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 08 Jun 2006 15:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=AE3yZqygbU+Wm4CeJTvvE1i1kGGsHVyS+/QFSLtBWgecWPGIkMjQ/7xaCjtsxo363ClSz3qKB9llfKymVojdb3LEHLaaDyQtJEhmT0tDgPBZg7YwfC9u7WFRyBAFO+bxtSQzspwftsu/gSRacx+7E4Pw5VvcI8SFP7qeYIq1g/0=
Received: by 10.48.163.10 with SMTP id l10mr1813197nfe;
        Thu, 08 Jun 2006 15:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.48.216.2 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Jun 2006 15:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <b38c6f4c0606081503x65c15934i437150f0bfaa216e@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 23:03:47 +0100
From: "Stuart Herbert" <stuart.herbert@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise thread -- a try of clarification
In-Reply-To: <20060608212132.GF6526@osgiliath>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <e67rp8$tt8$1@sea.gmane.org> <44887368.9030302@gentoo.org>
	 <20060608192004.GC6526@osgiliath>
	 <b38c6f4c0606081405l41b41cf1t156af3fc31bda0a2@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20060608212132.GF6526@osgiliath>
X-Archives-Salt: ac19cf98-50b6-417d-b5c5-92998df0f904
X-Archives-Hash: 75d728b0ce292ae0f3aac85315853ad7

Hi Henrik,

On 6/8/06, Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@gentoo.org> wrote:
> While reading the policy above, I stumbled across this line:
>
> "Bug Tracking: bugs.g.o is the OneTrueBugTrackingSystem(tm), even for
> overlays."
>
> Could you please elaborate on this?

Sure ... in the discussion we had on -dev earlier in the year about
the overlays service, it was agreed that we wouldn't maintain separate
bug tracking systems for each overlay.  All the bugs for each overlay
will go into bugs.gentoo.org.

This means that the following cycle can happen:

a) User A submits ebuild via bugzilla
b) Developer takes ebuild from bugzilla, and adds it to overlay for
testing & fixing
c) User B submits bug in bugzilla about the ebuild in the overlay

For example, we've been working that way in the webapps overlay for
some months now, and it's worked well for us (although we haven't been
using bugzilla until this week).

Hope that answers your question.

Best regards,
Stu
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list