From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EuXzq-0000zD-3D for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 16:29:50 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id k05GSR5G001795; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:28:27 GMT Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.204]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k05GQOdl012028 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:26:24 GMT Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o25so1139532nfa for ; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 08:26:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=aE2eh/Zf9+C2IYg9+6lf2Iji9kNdvLdpTk7a9P4cvVDUS8Bu9ficAMiIbtqB3db1YISCQGYfjWF8PG7Ua3Nu8f3laRKcxppiAsvxF3umBGmvReSbfT23gnBbLBfrJlmM/QwGQcKM2ZACwE8RftPxeniCq9zQ0T7yXL4rv7YXVFM= Received: by 10.48.246.4 with SMTP id t4mr700732nfh; Thu, 05 Jan 2006 08:26:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.216.14 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Jan 2006 08:26:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:26:24 +0000 From: Stuart Herbert To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: regular project updates In-Reply-To: <1136476815.20002.45.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2058_14014923.1136478384122" References: <1136476815.20002.45.camel@localhost> X-Archives-Salt: 1d173de0-eb96-4dda-9b7f-2f372c12131e X-Archives-Hash: 86b760df22ca0470fc5fd5055b368972 ------=_Part_2058_14014923.1136478384122 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi Patrick, On 1/5/06, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > I suggest project updates every 6 months (which roughly is the same > timeframe as releases) > Maybe this helps people get a "global vision" of where Gentoo is and > where it's going. Didn't the new metastructure place requirements on projects for things like this? I haven't managed to track down a copy to check. Best regards, Stu ------=_Part_2058_14014923.1136478384122 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi Patrick,

On 1/5/06, P= atrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.o= rg> wrote:
I suggest project updates every = 6 months (which roughly is the same
timeframe as releases)
Maybe this= helps people get a "global vision" of where Gentoo is and
where it's going.
 
Didn't the new metastructure place requirements on projects for things= like this?  I haven't managed to track down a copy to check.
 
Best regards,
Stu

 

------=_Part_2058_14014923.1136478384122-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list