From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 805AB139082 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D81CDE0C5C; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:56:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89843E0C2F for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:56:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.24] (x4dba8d97.dyn.telefonica.de [77.186.141.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: toralf) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CAE333BF3C for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 22:56:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for the 17.0 profiles To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1528131.eIYCIZq90I@pinacolada> <1829509.MJgcYlvNUa@laptop1.gw.ume.nu> <2103294.1u43DT8kDM@pinacolada> <6266569.atF1060YYL@pygoscelis> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Toralf_F=c3=b6rster?= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 23:56:08 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6266569.atF1060YYL@pygoscelis> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="R2gOjLbNsqLeIluH2AgT4DvPejwa2m0Dq" X-Archives-Salt: db7bf3a6-fb81-49d4-bb15-977a83c890b3 X-Archives-Hash: 7dd575d73ded166a8bc56ebf86f39cd5 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --R2gOjLbNsqLeIluH2AgT4DvPejwa2m0Dq Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="CJ1kWn2CE2SnhlMEqC2oHrieQcCHagG45"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Toralf_F=c3=b6rster?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for the 17.0 profiles References: <1528131.eIYCIZq90I@pinacolada> <1829509.MJgcYlvNUa@laptop1.gw.ume.nu> <2103294.1u43DT8kDM@pinacolada> <6266569.atF1060YYL@pygoscelis> In-Reply-To: <6266569.atF1060YYL@pygoscelis> --CJ1kWn2CE2SnhlMEqC2oHrieQcCHagG45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-GB On 10/10/2017 11:27 PM, Nils Freydank wrote: > It looks to me as there isn=E2=80=99t any emtytree world rebuild necess= ary, as long as=20 > someone comes from hardened with PIE enabled. Furthermore I do wonder if even rebuilding GCC is necessary - except for changed USE flags - for a hardened user already having PIE enabled ? --=20 Toralf PGP 23217DA7 9B888F45 --CJ1kWn2CE2SnhlMEqC2oHrieQcCHagG45-- --R2gOjLbNsqLeIluH2AgT4DvPejwa2m0Dq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE9Fss6CRzaFtvbcqtIyF9p5uIj0UFAlofOwwACgkQIyF9p5uI j0UlWQgArZq/MHJ7dNUFBVFShLcbm6L6dfGUBrD/gWFWh+RK72WhPBhoz6tLLR2F PTzPEpNL+VnjErrgrnlM3Op7qpUpM7M9ysMHs9xe3duv+WW+GSBKYa95qI9TUayS G7WcI0RqaAmxJ4tstBz9731c6e505/iLx0jno5wjLegH5MF5pGKE/24YxwpdTsD7 EVV2mYU6HvuuNYTePDDOsrUWTnqe8HC83xen4Ff8cEd90vsGn4vi0OcDXE7E0BOW Qyjo8qcp5fW6JmMbjHAAV6XhfAyUyNFbTz3XPMby48/d2eFwusfQaubSjkKN4iMd 0kcIchnkblpsFh6FBYs0U5AOLfDvNQ== =6lzB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --R2gOjLbNsqLeIluH2AgT4DvPejwa2m0Dq--