From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NfeDz-0001pt-Sr for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:57:16 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58E94E0A82; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jolexa.net (jolexa.net [69.164.197.24]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81FFE09E9 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by jolexa.net (Postfix, from userid 101) id 223015BA3A; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:56:59 +0000 (UTC) To: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove "dev"-status of mips profiles Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:56:58 +0000 From: Jeremy Olexa In-Reply-To: <20100211184141.GB20770@hrair> References: <20100211160404.TAb70b3.tv@veller.net> <20100211184141.GB20770@hrair> Message-ID: X-Sender: darkside@gentoo.org User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.3.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 278d659b-0901-479e-b338-8063342fb113 X-Archives-Hash: 2f13f1726c3040f4894237c4222f45b5 On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:41:41 -0800, Brian Harring wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 04:54:38PM +0100, Torsten Veller wrote: >> Can we please move the mips profiles from "dev" to "exp" in >> profiles/profiles.desc? >>=20 >>=20 >> The ~150 mips development profiles increase the time for a=20 >> `repoman -d full` run in dev-perl/ from three to five minutes. That is >> an increase of roughly 66 percent. >> repoman further prints more than 2000 lines of output for two keywording >> problems. >=20 > Quick pcheck visibility scan of the full tree, stats follow: >=20 > mips profiles still enabled: > * 116191 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency=20 > issue > * roughly 2m39s run time >=20 > mips profiles disabled (leaving mips-irix however) > * 9550 seperate dependency issues, 1 line per profile/dependency issue > * roughly 1m54s run time. >=20 > So... mips accounts for about 30% of the pcheck runtime, and *92%* of=20 > known visibility issues. As for the runtime difference between=20 > pcheck/repoman, pcheck has some tricks internally to reduce the # of=20 > profiles it has to scan down to just the unique USE/mask set- I'd=20 > expect the mips impact to be far larger w/out that trick in place. >=20 > At the very least if it's going to be kept around, experimental or=20 > not, the number of profiles in use there *really* needs reduction-=20 > mips has roughly 117 profiles listed in profiles.desc out of 217-=20 > literally ~54% of all dev/stable/experimental profiles. I agree, I wasn't sure why so many profiles were added[1] for a dead team (for all intensive purposes). Seems quite silly to me to leave them as 'dev' status. If a member of the mips team would reply to this thread, th= at would be good. (and surprising to me :) I would guess that it would be far easier to work in an overlay at this point. I would also guess that if there are ANY mips users out there that they would have to use some other ACCEPT_KEYWORDS value because the shape of ~mips is so...bad. -Jeremy [1]: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/profiles/profiles.desc?r1= =3D1.151&r2=3D1.152 >=20 > Either way, stats to chew on. > ~harring