From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5098515ACFB for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 04:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56EB5E09B4; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 04:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 028E2E099B for ; Fri, 28 Apr 2023 04:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EGO_SUM From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 06:27:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pm7oon5j.fsf@gentoo.org> References: <49ce8700-6c96-9360-51cf-2a989f666752@gentoo.org> <29b2aa18-7498-ad42-757e-fdebad9fa5a5@gentoo.org> <87o7nd58by.fsf@gentoo.org> <43c7d58b-cdaf-4e0d-f333-bd5cdc80a475@gentoo.org> <87pm7oon5j.fsf@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 2582e1f8-489e-4190-afd4-a396f8eaf58c X-Archives-Hash: 1290d6f3a965562f129f2bbce91c3720 On Fri, 2023-04-28 at 01:38 +0100, Sam James wrote: > Pascal J=C3=A4ger writes: >=20 > > Maybe I=E2=80=99m getting this wrong, but didn=E2=80=99t=C2=A0 we switc= h to shallow > > checkouts for the systems repository? I remember it was a major > > outcry on the mailing list. So at least for end users git keeps no > > history and our repository history should not impact clone size of a > > shallow copy, should it?=C2=A0 > >=20 >=20 > (Try to avoid top-posting if you can, reply after the message you're > replying to.) >=20 > rsync copies of the tree aren't affected by this, nor are full > git clones for development. >=20 Err, but full gentoo.git clones are definitely affected! After all, that's where huge ebuilds and their Manifests land first. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny