From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D3511396D9 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:15:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6FA79E0ECD; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:15:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail2.obsidian-studios.com (mail2.obsidian-studios.com [45.79.71.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE05DE0EA8 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21823 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2017 20:15:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO assp2.obsidian-studios.com) (wlt-ml@::ffff:127.0.0.1) by ::ffff:127.0.0.1 with ESMTPA; 15 Nov 2017 20:15:07 -0000 X-Assp-Version: 2.5.5(17223) on assp2.obsidian-studios.com X-Assp-ID: assp2.obsidian-studios.com m1-76907-12880 X-Assp-Session: 30842348C08 (mail 1) X-Assp-Envelope-From: wlt-ml@o-sinc.com X-Assp-Intended-For: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Assp-Server-TLS: yes Received: from unknown ([fdbe:bad:a55:0:1::211] helo=wlt.obsidian-studios.com) by assp2.obsidian-studios.com with SMTPSA(TLSv1_2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) (2.5.5); 15 Nov 2017 12:15:06 -0800 Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 15:14:49 -0500 From: "William L. Thomson Jr." To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] manifest-hashes changing to 'BLAKE2B SHA512' on 2017-11-21 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <1510763324.1312.5.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Obsidian-Studios, Inc. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/=soNJCRr.bD_BBXFxwfr5Kn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: b2780040-42d9-425c-9402-65fe69e74906 X-Archives-Hash: dfb46e4e8db0086b7f94edb801953963 --Sig_/=soNJCRr.bD_BBXFxwfr5Kn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 11:47:41 -0600 R0b0t1 wrote: .>=20 > Does the existence of a decision mean I would need to contact the > trustees if I feel the changes have not been adequately justified? They have no power here. Consider the foundation as second head of a 2 headed snake. Used to be 3 when infra was more powerful. Trustees maybe could if there was a different structure. But the foundations role is pretty limited and intentionally crippled. Unless you can provide a compelling legal case that would fall under the legal protection duties of the trustees. But in general Trustees cannot dictate to council, its the other way around. Council dictates to Trustees. I doubt it will ever change. I tried long ago. =20 Council has final say on all technical matters unless it involves legalities. --=20 William L. Thomson Jr. --Sig_/=soNJCRr.bD_BBXFxwfr5Kn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTEeldqZjmVut8bVHJNcbKkg6ozUAUCWgygOgAKCRBNcbKkg6oz UPhtAJ9aT+rA8v02306UfGXVYISrBB57EwCeIqX2UptL1co8UAo2INN6+qXHhsM= =PgxD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/=soNJCRr.bD_BBXFxwfr5Kn--