From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C4681396D0 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 20:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C7A11FC042; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 20:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.obsidian-studios.com (mail.obsidian-studios.com [173.230.135.215]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 004911FC008 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 20:42:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17971 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2017 20:42:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO assp1.obsidian-studios.com) (wlt-ml@::ffff:127.0.0.1) by ::ffff:127.0.0.1 with ESMTPA; 9 Aug 2017 20:42:36 -0000 X-Assp-Version: 2.5.5(17073) on assp1.obsidian-studios.com X-Assp-ID: assp1.obsidian-studios.com m1-11355-08319 X-Assp-Session: 38F5EEF0F48 (mail 1) X-Assp-Envelope-From: wlt-ml@o-sinc.com X-Assp-Intended-For: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Assp-Server-TLS: yes Received: from unknown ([2601:344:4100:1b0f:f2d5:bfff:feac:9077] helo=localhost) by assp1.obsidian-studios.com with SMTPSA(TLSv1_2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) (2.5.5); 9 Aug 2017 16:42:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 16:42:35 -0400 From: "William L. Thomson Jr." To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Prevent binary/non-compiled packages from binary package creation Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Obsidian-Studios, Inc. X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/YdcLkBBpMrAuYrU8K93Aw00"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: d8fab4aa-558d-4ca7-a821-3ebdd046a35a X-Archives-Hash: a7f0b06ab99541e03277d6144cf2f7d7 --Sig_/YdcLkBBpMrAuYrU8K93Aw00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just to clarify, the contenders for no binpkg would be the following, potentially more. - ebuilds that are fetch restricted - ebuilds that installs files unchanged, like kernel sources - Binary ebuilds, -bin, that just use src_install and do not build anything There may be some other cases, but I think that covers the main ones. The first case, should NEVER, not even optionally be allowed to be binpkg. That is re-distributing something that is fetch restricted. If it cannot be mirrored, I doubt it can legally be re-packaged. The later 2 could be "optional" defaulted to not build, but could be forced. There is little benefit at that point but some may prefer those be a binpkg. I have no problem with it being optional. --=20 William L. Thomson Jr. --Sig_/YdcLkBBpMrAuYrU8K93Aw00 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTEeldqZjmVut8bVHJNcbKkg6ozUAUCWYtzuwAKCRBNcbKkg6oz ULhQAJ9AMgEZD3ZJwvUyd7pATJcEVr9rpgCggjcdgC7OIJXtDXfPnO0TKLeqNcI= =xkEI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/YdcLkBBpMrAuYrU8K93Aw00--