From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A13D2158094 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 19:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B0B8E09A1; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 19:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E31F8E0954 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 19:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/3] glep-0074: clarifications about size and checksum fields From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 21:05:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20220923140355.1307514-1-mgorny@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.44.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 0a416b8a-ef36-43d3-861b-defd218eb76b X-Archives-Hash: a629f12569a311be2d3a19f7b2ecb762 On Fri, 2022-09-23 at 17:58 +0000, Sheng Yu wrote: > Hi, >=20 > The hash does not need to be lowercase. It can be a quick fix in portage = to accept any case. >=20 I'm all for fixing Portage but I don't think we should be breaking backwards compatibility over this. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny