From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E160F138262 for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 13:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21E6214229; Fri, 20 May 2016 13:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23C2C22405E for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 13:11:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.100.0.6] (host-37-191-220-247.lynet.no [37.191.220.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: k_f) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5A609340A2B for ; Fri, 20 May 2016 13:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new developers' keyword requests References: <20160519165130.7e9bc385@wim.fritz.box> <550ab3a6-1a4b-fa19-b111-5cbf82fe597e@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Kristian Fiskerstrand Message-ID: Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 15:11:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <550ab3a6-1a4b-fa19-b111-5cbf82fe597e@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HfExDFbbQ38Pk5Rb7B3SmbEcGLxAaAT4C" X-Archives-Salt: 407c85d6-bc78-4dc3-9463-05ea7d780f90 X-Archives-Hash: 8a59a39b69d64197a493db5819c3148f This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --HfExDFbbQ38Pk5Rb7B3SmbEcGLxAaAT4C Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="QJq77utWtLNOtxDeG0gh1eauxF9D55jWt" From: Kristian Fiskerstrand Reply-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] new developers' keyword requests References: <20160519165130.7e9bc385@wim.fritz.box> <550ab3a6-1a4b-fa19-b111-5cbf82fe597e@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <550ab3a6-1a4b-fa19-b111-5cbf82fe597e@gentoo.org> --QJq77utWtLNOtxDeG0gh1eauxF9D55jWt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/20/2016 02:38 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 05/20/2016 03:36 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> On 05/19/2016 07:51 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >=20 >=20 > keywording for a new arch should normally only be done when necessary, > mainly if it is a direct dependency of another package. There is no nee= d > to keywor it for an arch until it has been tested on that arch by some > user / developer ... certainly not because some committing developer > think it is nice to have all arches listed just in case. >=20 I should actually elaborate on this (in addition to fixing some spelling errors..), something to the line of "There is no need to keyword it for an arch until it is being _used_ by some user/developer on that arch" --=20 Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 --QJq77utWtLNOtxDeG0gh1eauxF9D55jWt-- --HfExDFbbQ38Pk5Rb7B3SmbEcGLxAaAT4C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJXPwz5AAoJECULev7WN52FyNoIAKtN00zESoP4CcaaI1YrErWm X+7CkXpiLsAkgDhl08bDV5PMk1B5VWAXSrUbf8N7WQeuyFCpKLHnZdp6T6HTMqHQ +bOV8MEP3cWdc3e6nsHjiMJjnaG+BE6Wu0Zj54IseoIvjGRrjycATTkGPxp1chcr PKITjK38XVhQ1Cn1tTLWuNGSt+p7s1Xsf67bcwbmGNJ5uZx42/T5y5+kVxjY3ahs me4CYPofPd40q/xkpOEs/4az4snJSXS1UZOuZ1Gi15PQxb/RjSHhXbed2x5lKyzH AoOLdHe02X5yMAI0VMv0IrBktYmqf0mjEmuWF5/pQVcROJROvGwIVZhyJT/c0no= =EJLQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HfExDFbbQ38Pk5Rb7B3SmbEcGLxAaAT4C--